Heritability estimates suggested that common variants explain much of genetic risk among APOE-{varepsilon}4 carriers, while unexplained heritability remains in non-carriers in the Amish, and GWAS confirmed APOE-{varepsilon}4 as the strongest genetic determinant of AD in the Amish.
Abstract
Background The genetic architecture of Alzheimer disease remains incompletely understood. Founder populations such as the Amish offer a unique opportunity to identify additional genetic variation influencing the disease. Method Using extensive pedigree and genomic data from Midwestern Amish communities, we estimated both pedigree- and SNP- based heritability of AD. In addition, genome-wide association studies and gene-based rare variant tests were performed. Results Heritability estimates suggested that common variants explain much of genetic risk among APOE-{varepsilon}4 carriers, while unexplained heritability remains in non-carriers in the Amish. GWAS confirmed APOE-{varepsilon}4 as the strongest genetic determinant of AD in the Amish. Rare variant analyses identified RIN3 and PILRA as significantly associated with risk of cognitive impairment; suggestive signals including CYP24A1 were also identified. Discussion These findings highlight the contributions of common and rare variants to Alzheimer disease and suggest factors beyond common variants may contribute to disease susceptibility particularly among the APOE-{varepsilon}4 non-carriers.
A heteroscedastic personalized regression framework is introduced to move beyond cohort-averaged associations and construct individualized single-nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) profiles for each subject, showing that model-derived individualized SNP-score profiles can reveal latent structure associated with cognitive an...
Some of the advantages of familial data using the Norwegian Mother, Father and Child Cohort Study (MoBa), a population-based cohort of parents and offspring with extensive genotype data, are illustrated along with broad and longitudinal phenotyping of health and functioning.
E. Corfield, A. Shadrin, O. Frei et al.· Nature· 3 citations
Understanding of the genetic architecture of AD in the context of its main genetic driver is improved, and APOE-stratified insights may help understand and overcome side effects, inform clinical trial enrollment strategies, and create the scientific basis for targeted, mechanism-driven therapies in neurodegenerative di...
J. Thomassen, H. Leonard, Brittany Ulms et al.· Nature Genetics· 0 citations
This review synthesizes current understanding of the genetic architecture of Alzheimer’s disease in the era of next-generation sequencing, with particular emphasis on variant classes beyond single nucleotide polymorphisms, and discusses somatic mosaicism that represents another layer of its complexity.
L. Lukyova, A. Zaťková, J. Minarík et al.· 0 citations
Genetic studies of serious mental illness (SMI, including schizophrenia and bipolar disorder) have implicated two classes of risk variant: common variants1-3, each of small effect but collectively accounting for most population-level risk, and ultra-rare coding variants4,5 which confer large risk in a small number of i...
Greta Gerdes, V. Tozzo, S. Service et al.· medRxiv· 0 citations
Brain iron accumulation is well established in Alzheimer's disease (AD), but whether the two share a genetic basis remains unclear. Here, we performed genome-wide association analyses of brain iron across six iron-rich brain regions, quantified via quantitative susceptibility mapping (QSM) in 38,142 UK Biobank particip...
M. R. Rahman, Y. Xia, P. Raniga et al.· medRxiv· 0 citations
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.