Oct 2026· Proceedings of the 14th Nordic Conference on Human-Computer Interaction· pp. 1-18· 0 citations· 44 references
TL;DR
The design and evaluation of an interactive self-assessment tool that enables interdisciplinary teams to assess ethical risks and opportunities throughout the lifecycle of AI-enabled projects and implications for the design of self-assessment tools are presented.
Abstract
As artificial intelligence (AI) becomes increasingly integrated into products and services, the need for practical, context-sensitive tools to support ethical design processes has grown. While numerous artificial intelligence (AI) ethics guidelines exist, they often remain abstract and difficult to apply in practice. In this paper, we present the design and evaluation of an interactive self-assessment tool that enables interdisciplinary teams to assess ethical risks and opportunities throughout the lifecycle of AI-enabled projects. Grounded in empirical research, including expert interviews, a stakeholder workshop, and evaluations with practitioners, the tool offers actionable recommendations tailored to project-specific factors and stakeholder perspectives. We contribute insights into the integration of our tool into collaborative projects and implications for the design of self-assessment tools, such as balancing guidance with flexibility, enabling ongoing reflection, and avoiding ethics-washing. Finally, we formulate key-learnings from the process that can inform future research in HCI working on the intersection of AI and ethics.
Three steps of the ENACT methodology are described and details three steps of the ENACT methodology and its potential and limitations for qualitative ethical risk assessment of AI in organisational settings are discussed.
N. Murashova, Leonora Onarheim Bergsjø, Heidi Dahl et al.· Nordic Machine Intelligence· 0 citations
A comprehensive model for integrating ethical standards into the phases of the Software Development Life Cycle (SDLC) is proposed, founded on the pillars of fairness, transparency, accountability, and sustainability, offering practical recommendations aimed at developers, organizations, and policymakers.
A. Alaswad· Al-Farooq Journal of Science...· 0 citations
The Artificial Intelligence (AI) responsibility gap is an abstract and uncertain ethical problem. Judgements of responsibility may change as the situation, available information, and the conditions for action change. Pre-designed ethics cases give learners a concrete setting for discussion, but the problem is usually f...
Fuji Lyu· European Conference on Games...· 0 citations
In this paper I investigate how integrating ethics deeply into technology research and development can help developers overcome a major obstacle in the ethical alignment of innovation processes, namely, the “principles-to-practice gap”. By reference to a specific ethics intervention made by Berlin Ethics Lab featuring...
The integration of generative AI (GenAI) into professional practice presents a significant challenge for higher education: how to prepare graduates to work effectively alongside AI with critical judgement, ethical awareness, and sustained human expertise. Drawing on 15 semi-structured interviews with marketing practiti...
L. Gill-Simmen, Chahna Gonsalves· Ubiquity Proceedings· 0 citations
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.