Aug 2026· Biomedicines· Vol 14· 0 citations· 95 references
Medicine
TL;DR
In this review, a review of recent in vivo hypermutation tools that enable rapid sampling of the vast evolutionary landscape, all while supporting simultaneous selection of the best proteins within living organisms are discussed.
Abstract
Directed evolution has revolutionized protein engineering by applying the principles of natural selection to the laboratory. However, traditional in vitro methods are quite labor-intensive, while common in vivo methods suffer from low mutation rates and high rates of off-target mutations. To address these issues, researchers have developed targeted mutagenesis tools for rapid in vivo evolution of biomolecules. In this review, we discuss recent in vivo hypermutation tools that enable rapid sampling of the vast evolutionary landscape, all while supporting simultaneous selection of the best proteins within living organisms. We focus on three main mechanisms of hypermutation: (i) orthogonal replication, which uses error-prone replication machinery to replicate the target gene with low fidelity; (ii) CRISPR-Cas-guided mutators, where mutagenic proteins are localized to virtually any user-defined loci; and (iii) transcription-coupled mutagenesis, a simple, yet elegant tool that exploits the innate processivity of orthogonal ribonucleic acid (RNA) polymerases to guide mutagenic proteins along the target gene during transcription. We highlight key advantages of these systems, as well as some clinically- and biotechnology-relevant applications. We discuss important limitations and how they could be addressed in the future to make hypermutation tools with broad mutational spectra and windows that span entire genes with minimal off-target effects.
A PLM-assisted physics-driven approach is presented that utilizes atomistic molecular dynamics simulations and automated path searching to efficiently obtain the complete kinetic insights, including the transition state structures, for the conformational changes of Cas before DNA cleavage.
DGRs can be installed in E. coli and reprogrammed for the continuous, iterative mutagenesis of user-defined target genes, and the DGR template RNA can be reprogrammed for gene- and residue-specific mutagenesis, leaving untargeted, adjacent residues unchanged.
Yang Liu, Yang-Qi Gu, Ganesh Agam et al.· bioRxiv· 0 citations
The potential of BpyAla-mediated nucleic acid cleavage is discussed, with emphasis on the development of next-generation BpyAla analogues, the exploration of alternative metal cofactors, cooperative and multi-residue design strategies, and the expansion of compatible protein scaffolds and nucleic acid substrates.
Eryn Lundrigan, Matthew T. O'Neill, J. P. Pezacki· Frontiers in Chemical Biolog...· 0 citations
This work demonstrates a distinct paradigm for library generation through efficient transfer of genetic elements to recipient cells bearing libraries of retron editors, efficient editing of cargo genes in recipient cells, and continuous iteration of the conjugation-editing cycles with selection for recipients in sequen...
Fabian B. H. Rehm, Martin Spinck, Jason W. Chin· bioRxiv· 0 citations
Genomic manipulation has advanced from stochastic nuclease‐mediated disruption toward programmable, deterministic precision. Early clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats (CRISPR) strategies enabled targeted mutagenesis through double‐strand breaks; however, their therapeutic application is limited by...