Skip to content
Open access

Evidence-Based Policy Advice? The German Council of Science and Humanities

2026 · fteval Journal for Research and Technology Policy Evaluation · pp. 82-104 · 0 citations

Abstract

This article examines the evolving role of the German Council of Science and Humanities (Wissenschaftsrat, WR) and assesses whether it can be regarded as an evidence-based advisory body. Drawing on historical, sociological, and organizational analyses, the paper traces how the WR’s mandate has shifted from post-war planning and federal coordination toward evaluation, accreditation, and support of national excellence policies. Despite these substantial changes, the WR’s committee structures – deeply embedded in Germany’s federal multilayered governance system – have remained largely unchanged. Three case studies illustrate the consequences of this institutional inertia: the 1968 recommendation to abolish professorial chairs, the 1988 proposal to expand structured doctoral training via graduate research schools, and the 2005/2012 selection decisions within the Excellence Initiative. The cases show that the WR’s recommendations were shaped by political consensus-seeking among federal and state executives and major non-university research organizations, leading to diluted reform proposals and limited systemic impact. The Excellence Initiative case further highlights legitimacy concerns, including extreme selectivity, path-dependent funding outcomes, and the persistence of structural size-based inequalities between universities. The article concludes that the WR primarily functions as a coordination and consensus-building body rather than an independent source of evidence-based policy advice. It argues that this arrangement fosters an “illusion of excellence”– a narrative suggesting substantial improvements in international competitiveness without commensurate structural or financial reforms. The article proposes establishing an independent expert council for higher education and science policy – potentially by expanding the mandate of the Expert Commission for Research and Innovation – to enable more rigorous, evidence-based policymaking for Germany’s university system.

Read PDF

Similar papers

Open access 2026

Two concepts of evidence-based policy

Abstract The notion that public policy should be evidence-based has gained prominence in recent years, attracting both supporters and critics. This article argues that a significant part of this debate stems from the coexistence of two distinct conceptions of what it means to base policy decisions on evidence: evidence...

T. V. Conti · 0 citations
Open access Aug 2026

Strengthening international evidence-informed policy making: lessons from the Global South.

Introduction Evidence-informed policy making (EIP) has generated substantial scholarship, but its contribution to the practicalities of policy making in international organisations is limited by the focus on a discreet and generally local level of governance. Furthermore, there is an acute bias in existing EIP literatu...

J. Espey, Zhengli Huang, Giada Casarin et al. · 0 citations
Open access Aug 2026

It Does Matter. A New Framework on the Influence of Policy Evaluation

Governments worldwide have invested heavily in policy evaluation, providing many policymakers with a steady stream of evidence into the effectiveness, efficiency, or relevance of policies. Yet, despite these investments, systematic knowledge about the actual influence of policy evaluations remains surprisingly limited....

Pirmin Bundi, Valérie Pattyn · 0 citations
Review Open access Aug 2026

Power, politics, and policy agency: towards a Functional Theory of Agency

This article examines how political position shapes policy agency in local policy making. Specifically, it asks: what patterns of policy agency functions do municipal councillors ( regidores ) exhibit in the local policy process? Drawing on the Functional Theory of Agency framework and a sequential mixed-methods de...

Oliver D. Meza, Ana Cecilia de Alba · 0 citations
Open access Jul 2026

The Script of the Science–Policy Interface: Performative Routines in Climate Politics

The urgency of political action to safeguard against anthropogenic climate change is widely acknowledged. Much of this urgency stems from environmental scientists’ projections that have consistently shown dire future risks. A key part in providing such projections with political legitimacy is institutional “science–pol...

J. Oomen, Maarten A. Hajer · 1 citation

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.