Skip to content
Review Open access

Artificial intelligence integration and patient safety culture: a cross-sectional study of healthcare professionals in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.

Jul 2026 · BMC Health Services Research · 0 citations
Medicine

TL;DR

The study found that healthcare practitioners in Riyadh generally perceived AI as a potentially valuable tool for supporting patient safety culture, particularly through improving diagnostic accuracy and reducing errors; however, concerns about data privacy and insufficient training remain significant barriers that must be addressed to ensure effective and safe AI integration.

Abstract

Background

This cross-sectional study investigates healthcare practitioners' perceptions of the implementation of artificial intelligence (AI) to enhance patient safety culture in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia, conducted from March to June 2025. The focus is on understanding how AI is perceived in the context of improving patient safety culture and aligning with Saudi Vision 2030 goals.

Methods

The study employed a cross-sectional design and administered self-administered online surveys via convenience sampling among healthcare practitioners across multiple healthcare settings in Riyadh. The study targeted a population including doctors, nurses, and allied health professionals. A structured questionnaire was developed to assess perceptions of AI, including key variables such as perceived AI benefits, concerns about data privacy, and the necessity of training. Descriptive statistics were computed to characterize the sample, including age, gender, and profession.

Results

Findings revealed that most participants perceived AI as supportive of patient safety through improved diagnostic accuracy, reduced medical errors, and streamlined workflows, which participants believed may contribute to a stronger patient safety culture. Descriptive analyses suggested variation in perceptions across professional groups.

Discussion

The study found that healthcare practitioners in Riyadh generally perceived AI as a potentially valuable tool for supporting patient safety culture, particularly through improving diagnostic accuracy and reducing errors; however, concerns about data privacy and insufficient training remain significant barriers that must be addressed to ensure effective and safe AI integration.

Conclusions

This study highlighted healthcare practitioners' positive perception of AI's role in enhancing patient safety culture in Riyadh. While AI is seen as beneficial in improving accuracy and reducing errors, challenges such as data privacy concerns and a lack of training were identified as barriers to its implementation. CLINICAL TRIAL NUMBER Not applicable.

Read PDF

Similar papers

Open access Jul 2026

Artificial intelligence use among healthcare professionals in healthcare facilities in Lagos, Nigeria: a cross-sectional study

Despite low formal training, use of AI-related digital tools was common among healthcare professionals in public health facilities in Lagos, primarily supporting diagnostic reasoning and clinical documentation.

A. Chima-Oduko, B. Maduafokwa, K. Abdulraheem et al. · 0 citations
Review Open access Aug 2026

Attitudes, perceptions, and factors influencing the adoption of artificial intelligence Among healthcare professionals in Saudi Arabia: a UTAUT-based study

This study offers empirical evidence and a roadmap for transforming enthusiasm into sustainable, safe, and meaningful AI integration, and may support healthcare leaders and policymakers in developing strategies for safe and sustainable AI integration within the Saudi healthcare system.

Yara Alrashed, N. Alsaheil · 0 citations
Review Mar 2026

Awareness, Perceptions, and Concerns among medical students regarding Artificial Intelligence integration in Healthcare: A Comprehensive Analysis

Undergraduate medical students show moderate awareness of AI in healthcare but lack formal training and in-depth understanding, highlighting the need for structured AI education within medical curricula and further research on its long-term impact.

Sonali Sharma, Smriti Kayat, N. Saboo et al. · 0 citations
Review Open access Aug 2026

Artificial Intelligence Adoption in Public Health Practice: A Cross-Sectional Study of Practical Determinants Among Healthcare Professionals

In this modest, single-centre sample, AI adoption was independently associated with knowledge and trust, and legal concern was independently and negatively associated with usage intensity; the apparent dampening of the knowledge–usage relationship by legal concern was suggestive but not statistically confirmed.

Carla Aurelia Stoiacovici, A. Ilie, Felicia Marc et al. · 0 citations
Open access Jul 2026

Patients’ Perception and Attitude Toward Artificial Intelligence: A Cross-Sectional Study

Assessment of patients’ perceptions of the integration of Artificial Intelligence in healthcare and its impact on the doctor–patient relationship and participants’ trust, comfort, and concerns toward AI use found comfort and trust in AI are significantly affected by factors such as gender and digital literacy.

Faten M. Rabie, Youmna Mamdouh, Rama Ah. Alabadd et al. · 0 citations
Review Aug 2026

Knowledge and perception of artificial intelligence among operating room staff in educational hospitals: a cross-sectional survey.

Despite favorable attitudes toward AI, OR staff demonstrated substantial deficiencies in AI knowledge, and targeted educational initiatives may be warranted to improve AI knowledge among perioperative healthcare professionals and support the safe integration of clinical informatics.

Farzaneh Nekuei manesh, Zahra Eydizadeh, M. Sohrabi et al. · 0 citations

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.