Aug 2026· Journal of Business Anthropology· 1 citation· 31 references
TL;DR
It is argued that LLMs represent a fundamental shift in human-technology interaction, one requiring ritualistic linguistic precision rather than technical commands, and that effective prompt construction functions as ritual magic through three essential elements: clear and specific language, contextual framing, and structured sequencing.
Abstract
This essay reframes the discourse around large language models (LLMs) by drawing on anthropological and linguistic theories of magic as a positive transformative force. While current discussions often cast AI as mysteriously dangerous – a form of “dark magic” that beguiles users and obscures ethical concerns – we argue that LLMs represent a fundamental shift in human-technology interaction, one requiring ritualistic linguistic precision rather than technical commands. Drawing on theories of performative language and magical rites, we propose that effective prompt construction functions as ritual magic through three essential elements: clear and specific language, contextual framing, and structured sequencing. In this, we show that AI is not a singular tool operation, but rather a mode of forming a mutual cybernetic relationship. Through case studies from the AI Anthropology Toolkit, we show how skilled practitioners harness the “magical” capabilities of LLMs for analytical insights through careful prompt engineering. We then examine implications for business anthropologists working in organizational settings, exploring how this cybernetic relationship enables distributed agency and co-becoming between human expertise and computational pattern recognition. This perspective provides both a theoretical contribution to understanding human-AI interaction and practical guidance for anthropological practice in an era of increasingly sophisticated AI collaboration.
This project developed the Large Language Human Machine: an embodied, “black box” device that prints cryptic, ritualistic instructions for the user to perform, Inspired by instruction-based performance art, the project treats instruction as a design material to expose shifting dynamics of authority, opacity, and agency...
K. Zheng, Sang-won Leigh· Creativity & Cognition· 0 citations
Chimamanda Ngozi Adichie’s metafictional short story, “Jumping Monkey Hill” is used as a laboratory to explore the relationship between fictionality and believability in a situation where rhetorical cues about a text’s ontological status are misleading and how literary ways of reading might inform engagement with AI te...
This article accepts that diagnosis but challenges its explanatory framework, to understand a large language model (LLM) as a *techno-semiotic machine* that automates a phase of written semiosis by producing plausible linguistic configurations from the sedimented archive of human writing.
Why what is really a matter of data analytics and statistical prediction is so readily assumed to be a display of real intelligence and even emergent cognition is explored by genealogically tracing the relationship between machines, organisms and language.
Chantelle Gray· Deleuze and Guattari Studies· 0 citations
It is argued that anthropology requires a new conceptual framework for understanding the contemporary social life of artificial intelligence (AI), and "the magic of AI" is proposed as an analytical concept that shifts attention from AI's technical capacities to the beliefs, uncertainties, and sociotechnical imaginaries...
M. Baas, Roanne van Voorst· Anthropological Theory· 2 citations
How AI systems work by recycling a narrow set of visual tropes in their training data that have very little to do with human notions of intelligence or creativity is shown.
Matti Pohjonen· Anthropological Theory· 0 citations
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.