Skip to content
Open access

From Terrestrial Laser Scans to Queryable Robot Knowledge: A VLM-Verified Framework for Incremental 3D Semantic Modeling

Sep 2026 · Electronics · 0 citations · 20 references

Abstract

Indoor service and inspection robots need environment knowledge that is queryable, reliable, and maintainable as the site changes, yet open-vocabulary 3D pipelines propagate unverified labels downstream and build-once scene models offer no maintenance path. We present TLS-SMF, a semantic modeling framework that converts registered terrestrial laser scans into a confidence-aware semantic knowledge graph and keeps it current across repeated scans. TLS-SMF combines (i) a deterministic geometric backbone whose re-runs are byte-identical on the same host, (ii) multi-view vision–language-model verification with automatic escalation that retains unresolved objects as explicitly unverified, and (iii) identity-preserving incremental updates that apply confidence-gated node-level upserts to mint-once node identities. Across two operational configurations of one industrial room, escalation lifts verification accuracy from 77.8% to 88.9% and from 78.1% to 84.4%, with 94.4–100% unanimous-vote precision against confirmed owner ground truth; on the showroom benchmark, structurally gated querying answers 83.3% of questions versus 52.1% for an unverified Stage-A LLM baseline while blocking hallucination traps; in a controlled same-quality combined-edit re-scan, selective re-verification reduces VLM cost to 3.1% of a full rebuild; and a real three-epoch study detects 2/2 controlled physical changes with zero observed identity switches on strong reference correspondences, while re-segmentation still produces false-new/false-absent cases. A cross-floor cafeteria stress scene bounds domain transfer, and an owner-in-the-loop revision path keeps the single semantic store corrigible for robot-facing use; the same store drives a physical mobile manipulator, which completes three console-issued semantic missions with a mean arrival error of 0.30 m while phantom goals are refused with zero motion.

Read PDF

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.