Aug 2026· Journal of Circular Economy· 0 citations· 58 references
Abstract
The just circular economy (JCE) has emerged as a structuring normative horizon in sustainability transitions, but its analytical value remains limited by two structural gaps: the absence of a constitutive definition integrating all justice dimensions identified in the literature, and the absence of a typology capable of distinguishing genuinely integrative configurations from partial or strategic uses of the concept. Drawing on a Weberian ideal-type theorisation approach, this article advances three interrelated contributions. It proposes a constitutive and normative definition of the JCE structured around five interdependent justice dimensions derived from three theoretical pillars: multidimensional environmental justice, intergenerational equity, and circularity justice. Four dimensions, namely distributive, procedural, and recognitive justice alongside intergenerational equity, rest on a consolidated theoretical corpus; the fifth, circularity justice, is formalised as an emerging construct that renders visible the injustices internal to circular value chains that existing tripartite frameworks cannot detect, notably the transfer of costs, risks, or injustices from one actor, one territory, or one generation to another. It further develops a configurational typology of five archetypal JCE forms, specifically the redistributive, procedural, recognitive, sustainable, and integrative forms. It finally formalises circularity justice as a fifth analytical dimension, initiating a research programme centred on the construction of intra-chain justice indicators capable of measuring the just circularity gap within global value chains. Taken together, these contributions provide an operational diagnostic framework enabling the distinction between a substantive JCE and a façade JCE, and open a structured empirical agenda for future research.
The circular economy, dominated by capitalocentric, technocentric, and eco‐modernist discourses, risks perpetuating systemic injustice because of its limited consideration of the social and of what is possible. In this article, we examine how social justice can be embedded into circular business models (CBMs)—key dri...
Fernando C. Lit, Erik Paredis, J. Huijben et al.· Business Strategy and the En...· 0 citations
Despite growing policy interest, global circularity is declining — falling to just 6.9% in 2025. This paper argues that a key reason is the absence of a concrete vision of what a circular economy would look like as a physical place. To provide that vision, the argument traces a line across three bodies of work. Bauwens...
Steven Liaros· Journal of Circular Economy· 0 citations
Circular economy (CE) has become the organising promise of sustainable plastics, yet its reconciliation of continued material output with reduced environmental harm remains more often asserted than demonstrated. Building on prior critical discourse analysis of corporate circularity narratives, this Perspective asks wha...
Ivan Kibet, T. Doering, Juergen Wieser· Journal of Circular Economy· 0 citations
Economic development has generated major gains in productivity, technological capability and material prosperity, while also intensifying ecological pressures, unequal value distribution and the separation of financial performance from social contribution. This conceptual article develops the Meaningful Economy as an i...
J. Retolaza, Leire San-Jose· Advances in Social Sciences...· 0 citations
This dissertation asks what sustainability becomes when it is read not as a stable concept, but as a contested signifier constructed by discourse. Rather than seeking a definitive definition, it examines how sustainability is articulated, stabilized, opened, and closed across institutional and political texts. Drawing...
Deborah Martinez· 1 citation
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.