Axiom-0, a VLA policy that addresses both the quality of its representations and their use in action generation through hierarchical self-refinement, is presented, a VLA model that combines pretrained multimodal understanding with learned control on unfamiliar task compositions.
Abstract
Reliable manipulation requires policies that generalize across tasks, layouts, and object interactions. Vision-language-action (VLA) models combine pretrained multimodal understanding with learned control, but their performance remains limited on unfamiliar task compositions. We present Axiom-0, a VLA policy that addresses both the quality of its representations and their use in action generation through hierarchical self-refinement. Intra-VLM Representation Refinement (IVRR) strengthens selected intermediate features through consistency supervision with learned feature projections during training. VLM-Action Interface Refinement (VAIR) recursively updates the resulting conditioning before action generation. Joint optimization of the supervised VLM layers, VAIR, and the action generator connects the two components. On RoboCasa365, Axiom-0 achieves 62.32% overall success in our evaluation, exceeding the highest published leaderboard score (Paimon-0, 58.1%) by 4.22 percentage points and the Xiaomi-Robotics-1 reference by 4.92 points. Under the evaluated profiling setup, mean action-chunk generation latency increases by 1.7% over Xiaomi-Robotics-1. These results demonstrate improved task completion with modest inference overhead.
PHR-VLA introduces a lightweight auxiliary future head that, during training, aligns the VLA's internal representations with latent dynamics extracted from future observations, demonstrating that privileged latent dynamics alignment provides an effective training signal for improving anticipatory reasoning in VLA polic...
Davood Soleymanzadeh, Kai-Di Zhang, Zhi-Yuan Zhang et al.· 2 citations
Within this trained-task regime, DEM sits on the observed success--latency--energy frontier and provides a strong, efficient baseline for language-conditioned robot skills.
Xia-Tao Sun, Chen Liang, Zi-Yao Zeng et al.· 2 citations
Vision-language-action (VLA) models are a promising approach to general purpose robot manipulation. While the internal computation of vision-language models, which compose the backbone of VLAs, has been studied extensively, less is known about how their perceptual and semantic representations are transformed into actio...
Aiden Swann, Mathilde Papillon, Mozes Jacobs et al.· 0 citations
Vision-Language-Action (VLA) models achieve strong robotic manipulation performance but incur high computational costs from processing long token sequences at every control step, limiting real-time deployment. Visual token pruning offers a direct solution, as visual patches dominate the input sequence and contain consi...
Vision-language-action (VLA) models achieve strong performance across embodied manipulation tasks by unifying visual understanding, language conditioning, and action generation. However, long-horizon tasks can involve non-Markovian dependencies: successful decisions may require retaining task progress and past interact...
Ting-Wen Du, Hao-Yu Guo, Han-Xue Zhang et al.· 0 citations
IMLE-VLA is introduced, which replaces the iterative action head with a single-step conditional generator trained via conditional Implicit Maximum Likelihood Estimation (cIMLE), and promotes multimodal action coverage, avoiding the mode collapse of naive regression heads while eliminating multi-step sampling entirely.
Kian Hosseinkhani, Qin-He Peng, George Shramko et al.· arXiv.org· 2 citations
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.