GRaSP: Latency-Aware Optimization for Geo-Distributed Retrieval-Augmented Generation
Hardik RuparelRaj Kumar PandeyPramod Kumar
Oct 2026
Artificial IntelligenceNatural Language Processing
Abstract
Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) is increasingly served across geo-distributed cloud and edge infrastructures, where wide-area latency, cross-region egress cost, and data-residency rules compete with retrieval quality. Conventional pipelines rank by semantic similarity alone and ignore where content lives, inflating tail latency and cost. We formalize the Geo-RAG Selection Problem (GRaSP), a drop-in re-scoring layer that decays relevance by latency and adds an optional cost penalty under a cardinality budget and per-region caps, with no retraining. We first settle its complexity: the base formulation is a linear objective over a partition matroid, solved optimally by an O(N log N) greedy algorithm, rather than NP-hard as a knapsack framing suggests, with hardness entering only under an additive egress budget. On a five-node CloudLab testbed emulating a four-region WAN over the Natural Questions corpus (2.68M passages), GRaSP's benefit is placement-dependent: under uniform placement it cuts fetch latency at negligible quality cost; under topical (residency-like) placement it traces a recall-latency Pareto frontier that dominates relevance-only, nearest-k, and a latency-budgeted baseline. At a moderate latency setting, GRaSP lowers P90 fetch latency by 41% while retaining 78% of relevance-only's recall, with sub-millisecond selection overhead, stable to 200 queries/s. Findings generalize across four public BEIR benchmarks. In end-to-end question answering, GRaSP reduces context-fetch latency by 43% while remaining within 0.062 absolute EM of relevance-only retrieval.
This paper investigates developing real-world perception for active agents, proposes Gibson Environment for this purpose, and showcases a set of perceptual tasks learned therein.
F. Xia, Amir Zamir, Zhi-Yang He et al.· 2018 IEEE/CVF Conference on...· 1,069 citations· ⚡112
This publication proposes a definition and a classification of agile software development approaches and analyses ten software development methods that can be characterized as being "agile" against the defined criterion.
P. Abrahamsson, O. Salo, Jussi Ronkainen et al.· arXiv.org· 727 citations· ⚡54
Consequences of happiness and unhappiness that are beneficial and detrimental for developers' mental well-being, the software development process, and the produced artifacts are found.
D. Graziotin, Fabian Fagerholm, Xiaofeng Wang et al.· Journal of Systems and Softw...· 236 citations· ⚡13
The Mobile-D approach is briefly outlined here and the experiences gained from four case studies are discussed, which helped develop an agile development approach for mobile application development.
P. Abrahamsson, Antti Hanhineva, H. Hulkko et al.· Conference on Object-Oriente...· 225 citations· ⚡18
GAOKAO-Bench is introduced, an intuitive benchmark that employs questions from the Chinese GAOKAO examination as test samples, including both subjective and objective questions that contribute a robust evaluation benchmark for future large language models and offers valuable insights into the advantages and limitations...
Xiaotian Zhang, Chun-yan Li, Yi Zong et al.· arXiv.org· 216 citations· ⚡17
A study with 42 participants investigates the relationship between the affective states, creativity, and analytical problem-solving skills of software developers and offers support for the claim that happy developers are indeed better problem solvers in terms of their analytical abilities.
D. Graziotin, Xiaofeng Wang, P. Abrahamsson· PeerJ· 216 citations· ⚡13