This chapter surveys 34 peer-reviewed papers applying generative LLMs to literature retrieval and the screening of candidate studies against eligibility criteria, identified via a Boolean search over the OpenAIRE Graph.
Abstract
The rapid growth of scholarly literature has made identifying relevant publications increasingly difficult, and conventional search systems still depend heavily on manually formulated queries and effortful manual inspection. Generative large language models (LLMs) offer a more flexible alternative, supporting literature retrieval and the screening of candidate studies against eligibility criteria. This chapter surveys 34 peer-reviewed papers applying generative LLMs to these two tasks, identified via a Boolean search over the OpenAIRE Graph (1,589 records screened to 34 inclusions). Reviewed studies are characterised by LLMs employed, model access and adaptation, prompting and architectural techniques, ground-truth sources, and evaluation metrics.
This systematic literature review (SLR) provides a comprehensive overview of pruning techniques applied to LLMs, based on 60 peer-reviewed studies and preprints published between 2022 and 2025, sourced from major digital libraries.
F. Bazikar, Atefeh Hemmati, Akram Reza et al.· Knowledge and Information Sy...· 0 citations
An LLM-based framework is proposed that leverages full-text key-insight extraction to enhance literature classification and implemented a confidence-weighted voting (CWV) mechanism using multiple LLMs to improve robustness.
Zihan Song, Shan Huang, Ngeemasara Thapa et al.· 0 citations
A complete workflow that can be adopted for new, unlabelled reviews, using open-source LLMs small enough to run on a high-end consumer laptop, and provided as an open-source R package is offered.
S. Spillias, Laura Avila-Turriago, C. Brown et al.· bioRxiv· 0 citations
This survey examines how these methods integrate graphs into various stages of the LLM pipeline, including the input, model, and output phases, and outlines the challenges and future research directions for developing more efficient and interpretable solutions.
Xin-Yan Zhu, Cheng Yang, Qiu-Yue Wang et al.· Proceedings of the Thirty-Fi...· 0 citations
The Conference Organisers and Content Identifier (COCI) is presented, an AI-based framework designed to extract fine-grained, structured metadata from raw CfP texts and bridges the gap between informal scholarly dissemination and structured Semantic Web resources.
Angelo Salatino, Francesco Osborne, Alexis Vizcaino et al.· 0 citations
The review reveals three main theoretical perspectives on modeling: the scientific paper as an instance of a text model, the scientific paper as a genre of scientific discourse and the scientific paper as an argumentation of scientific claims.
Mengjuan Weng, Xiaoguang Wang, Ning-Yuan Song et al.· Journal of Documentation· 0 citations
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.