Skip to content

VoLN: Vision-Only Long-Horizon Navigation - Paradigm, Benchmark, and Method

Jul 2026 · arXiv.org · Vol abs/2607.21400 · 0 citations · 36 references
Computer Science

TL;DR

This work instantiates VoLN for aerial navigation through VoLN-UAV, a 7,210-episode benchmark that combines long-horizon goal-directed flight, continuous 3D motion, large viewpoint changes, and context-dependent beacon selection and reveals substantial remaining challenges in long-horizon evidence integration, cross-view goal matching, and closed-loop stability.

Abstract

Vision-and-Language Navigation (VLN) enables embodied agents to follow natural-language instructions. However, route-level instructions commonly encode spatial priors, such as orientation, distance, and layout, that are not explicitly available from onboard sensing at deployment in open, GPS-denied environments. Benchmark performance under such interfaces therefore jointly reflects visual navigation ability and the use of route structure explicitly supplied by the task description. As a complementary formulation, we propose Vision-Only Long-Horizon Navigation (VoLN), which shifts route-relevant information from externally supplied instructions and global guidance to locally observable in-scene cues. In VoLN, goal views specify the destination, while route-relevant information is available only through locally observable in-scene cues that the agent must detect, interpret, and select online. We instantiate VoLN for aerial navigation through VoLN-UAV, a 7,210-episode benchmark that combines long-horizon goal-directed flight, continuous 3D motion, large viewpoint changes, and context-dependent beacon selection. We further provide VoLN-MLLM as an initial reference baseline. It aligns self-supervised visual features with a structured semantic space and predicts short-horizon waypoint segments from observation history, goal views, retrieved visual--semantic tokens, and proprioception. On the five-environment Test-Unseen split, it obtains success rates of 7.4%, 4.5%, and 1.8% on Easy, Normal, and Hard episodes, respectively. These results provide an initial evaluation of VoLN and reveal substantial remaining challenges in long-horizon evidence integration, cross-view goal matching, and closed-loop stability. Project page: https://admire-ljb.github.io/VoLN-UAV/

View source

Similar papers

Review Open access Aug 2026

Vision-and-Language Navigation: A Component-Centric Survey of Interactions, Coupling, and Deployment

This survey revisits VLN from a component-internal perspective, viewing it as a navigation system composed of internal components such as instructions, environment representations, and embodied agents, and organizing existing work around the functions and interactions of these components.

Xiang-Xun Wu, Yin-Sheng Wu, Xiaojiang Peng · 0 citations
#artificial intelligence Preprint Aug 2026

LightNav-0: Eliciting VLM Spatial Intelligence for Generalist Embodied Navigation

LightNav-0 is presented, a compact generalist embodied navigation model that elicits the spatial intelligence of a pretrained VLM and aligns it with navigation, without task-specific prediction heads, and establishes compact VLMs as a unified and transferable backbone for generalist embodied navigation.

Shao-An Wang, Ao-Cheng Luo, Fei Huang et al. · 0 citations
Preprint Aug 2026

From Semantic Grounding to Decision Optimization: A Unified Framework for Long-Horizon UAV Vision-Language Navigation

This work presents an instruction-grounded semantic enhancement module that injects object-level semantics and relative spatial cues into the current observation state, and develops a relevance-aware dynamic temporal aggregation strategy that reweights the full history buffer while converting a few high-relevance frames into structured landmark prompts for the decoder.

Ze-Yuan Ma, Jiaxin Chen, Di Huang · 0 citations
Conference Open access Sep 2026

FILD-Nav:Vision-and-Language Navigation with Instruction Landmark Features in Continuous Environments

FILD-Nav extracts task-relevant landmarks from instructions and incorporates landmark semantics into both waypoint prediction and topological planning, which improves waypoint relevance and enables more effective long-horizon navigation.

Chuan-Ye Hu, Lu-Lu Liu, Huai-Wei Si et al. · 0 citations
Preprint Sep 2026

Map the Possibilities: Spatial Belief Fields for Language-Goal Aerial Navigation

Language-goal aerial navigation requires an agent to local- ize a potentially unobserved target from relational instruc- tions and partial observations, and translate this inference into metric actions in large-scale continuous environments. Existing methods often reduce language grounding to one single waypoint or action, prematurely collapsing the spatial uncertainty inherent in incomplete evidence and ambiguous relations. To address this limitation, we introduce SBFNav, a closed-loop navigation framework centered on a language- conditioned Spatial Belief Field (SBF). Unlike ego-centric maps that primarily record what has been observed, SBF rep- resents a task-conditioned distribution over plausible target locations, preserving multiple spatial hypotheses under par- tial evidence. At each step, this distribution is updated from accumulated observations as new evidence becomes avail- able. Built on this representation, SBFNav selects the goal that best aligns with the instruction and observations as a met- ric waypoint for control. Experiments on both the original and revised CityNav benchmarks achieve the best reported overall performance. On the Test Unseen split, our method improves SR from 25.91% to 32.29% and SPL from 19.63% to 30.43%. Ablation studies further confirm the advantages of spatial-belief modeling over single-point prediction.

Hao-Tian Xu, Yue Hu, Zheng-Qiu Zhu et al. · 0 citations

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.