Artificial IntelligenceNatural Language Processing
Abstract
Computational pathology (CPath) analyses increasingly depend on multi-step computational workflows that require substantial programming expertise, limiting their accessibility to pathologists and other domain experts without extensive coding experience. Although large language models (LLMs) provide a promising natural-language interface for constructing such analyses, hallucinated operations and incorrect workflow specifications limit their reliability in scientific settings. We introduce Tissue Image Analysis Agent (TIAgent), an automated CPath workflow generation framework that, given a natural-language prompt specifying a complex analytical task together with an input dataset, automatically constructs a verifiable computational graph employing existing CPath operations. The resulting graph can be inspected and executed, enabling natural-language construction of complex CPath workflows for applications including automated biomarker discovery and tissue analysis. We demonstrate end-to-end workflow generation and execution and systematically benchmark 14 backbone LLMs across 90 unit tasks spanning 18 CPath operation types. The ability of each LLM to generate a complete and correct unit workflow is quantified using Unit Workflow Success (UWS). Performance varied substantially across backbone models, with Kimi-K2.7-Code achieving the highest UWS of 0.967 (95% CI: 0.907-0.989). Analysis of node and parameter correctness further revealed that selecting the appropriate computational operation and correctly configuring it represent distinct challenges for LLM-based workflow generation. TIAgent provides a foundation for making complex CPath workflow construction more accessible while enabling systematic evaluation of LLM-driven scientific workflow generation.
This paper investigates developing real-world perception for active agents, proposes Gibson Environment for this purpose, and showcases a set of perceptual tasks learned therein.
F. Xia, Amir Zamir, Zhi-Yang He et al.· 2018 IEEE/CVF Conference on...· 1,069 citations· ⚡112
This publication proposes a definition and a classification of agile software development approaches and analyses ten software development methods that can be characterized as being "agile" against the defined criterion.
P. Abrahamsson, O. Salo, Jussi Ronkainen et al.· arXiv.org· 727 citations· ⚡54
Consequences of happiness and unhappiness that are beneficial and detrimental for developers' mental well-being, the software development process, and the produced artifacts are found.
D. Graziotin, Fabian Fagerholm, Xiaofeng Wang et al.· Journal of Systems and Softw...· 236 citations· ⚡13
The Mobile-D approach is briefly outlined here and the experiences gained from four case studies are discussed, which helped develop an agile development approach for mobile application development.
P. Abrahamsson, Antti Hanhineva, H. Hulkko et al.· Conference on Object-Oriente...· 225 citations· ⚡18
GAOKAO-Bench is introduced, an intuitive benchmark that employs questions from the Chinese GAOKAO examination as test samples, including both subjective and objective questions that contribute a robust evaluation benchmark for future large language models and offers valuable insights into the advantages and limitations...
Xiaotian Zhang, Chun-yan Li, Yi Zong et al.· arXiv.org· 216 citations· ⚡17
A study with 42 participants investigates the relationship between the affective states, creativity, and analytical problem-solving skills of software developers and offers support for the claim that happy developers are indeed better problem solvers in terms of their analytical abilities.
D. Graziotin, Xiaofeng Wang, P. Abrahamsson· PeerJ· 216 citations· ⚡13