GPDPO: Learning from Reward Conflicts via Group Pareto-Dominance Policy Optimization

Abstract

Multi-reward reinforcement learning offers a promising framework for aligning large language models (LLMs) with diverse objectives, but conflicting reward signals can induce ambiguous update directions and hinder stable optimization. Existing approaches address such conflicts through reward reweighting, gradient coordination, or rollout filtering, yet they primarily operate on per-response or group-level optimization signals and underexploit relational information among sampled responses. As a result, conflict-filtered rollouts may still contain useful supervision that is discarded during training. We propose Group Pareto-Dominance Policy Optimization (GPDPO), a multi-reward policy optimization method that recovers pairwise supervision from conflict-filtered rollouts. GPDPO identifies Pareto-dominance relations among sampled responses and converts them into auxiliary preference signals, which are jointly optimized with the original policy objective. This enables more effective reuse of existing rollouts without additional sampling or reward evaluation. Experiments on API-Bank across multiple model scales and reward configurations show that GPDPO consistently outperforms competitive multi-reward optimization baselines. Further analysis demonstrates that GPDPO reduces both group-relative and pairwise reward conflicts, supporting the effectiveness of exploiting relational supervision for multi-reward alignment. Code will be released.