Aug 2026· Digital Studies in Language and Literature· 0 citations· 23 references
TL;DR
This study aims to explore how B2-level students enrolled in a university preparatory program use data-driven learning and generative AI tools in the collaborative opinion essay writing process and highlights the critical role of pedagogical design and teacher facilitation in DDL-AI-assisted writing instruction.
Abstract
Abstract In the last few decades, data-driven learning and generative artificial intelligence (AI) applications have become increasingly visible in academic writing instruction. The data-driven learning approach promotes students’ lexical and morphological awareness by encouraging them to explore language in context, while generative AI tools offer new possibilities for idea generation, text development, and linguistic feedback. However, limited process-based studies exist on how these two approaches work together in collaborative writing in the classroom and how teacher guidance shapes this process. This study aims to explore how B2-level students enrolled in a university preparatory program use data-driven learning and generative AI tools in the collaborative opinion essay writing process. Designed as a qualitative classroom-based case study, the research was conducted over a seven-week module. Structured student diaries, teacher journals and semi-structured interviews were used in the data collection process. Findings indicate that tool use was constructed through peer negotiation and teacher mediation. Students used generative AI for idea generation and corpus tools for lexical verification and contextual checking. The study highlights the critical role of pedagogical design and teacher facilitation in DDL-AI-assisted writing instruction.
Examination of a classroom practice using Personary, a digital mind-mapping platform with an optional AI-assisted mode, to explore how university students conceptualize competencies needed in the AI era shows that students understood AI-era competencies as multidimensional capacities rather than as technical skills alo...
The findings reveal that pre-service teachers perceive generative artificial intelligence as a supportive learning partner in areas such as time management, idea development, linguistic accuracy, and self-regulation, but also highlighted risks such as over-reliance, diminished creativity, ethical concerns, and the gene...
Mehmet Kokoç· Uludağ Üniversitesi Eğitim F...· 0 citations
The findings suggest that AI-generated feedback supported targeted revision when it is accessible, interpretable, and aligned with classroom assessment criteria.
A. Tzirides, Michele Galla, B. Cope et al.· Ubiquitous Learning An Inter...· 0 citations
How students and teachers in a Colombian university language program perceived GenAI-supported production was explored and four patterns emerged: GenAI as a rehearsal and revision partner; tension between polished output and language ownership; teacher mediation shifting toward critical language awareness; and the need...
Dionelio Jesus Moreno Villalobos· International Journal of AI...· 0 citations
It is concluded that prompt engineering should be formally integrated into EFL writing instruction to cultivate essential digital-age literacy skills and advocate for curriculum innovation that effectively bridges traditional composition pedagogy with the emerging demands of AI-mediated communication.
This paper proposes a practical framework for teachers to integrate AI tools in ways that strengthen, rather than replace, students' reasoning and evaluation skills and addresses ethical concerns including plagiarism risk and skill erosion.
Ajinkya S. Gujarkar· International Journal of Res...· 0 citations
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.