Results support MARL expert distillation as a data-efficient route to compact multi-agent VLA control in this simulated setting, and identify a training–inference feature mismatch in behavior cloning and address it via prompt-end action pooling.
Abstract
Coordinating multiple unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) for cooperative missions requires agents that perceive their environment, reason about objectives, and generate joint actions. Vision–language–action (VLA) models unify these capabilities but lack a principled source of multi-agent training data and suffer from a training–inference discrepancy in closed-loop control. We propose MiniUAV-VLA, a compact centralized VLA controller for simulated multi-UAV search-and-elimination based on multi-agent reinforcement learning (MARL) expert distillation. A QMIX expert policy achieving 100% mission success generates multimodal demonstrations pairing rendered tactical map images with structured textual state prompts. A 158 M-parameter VLA model with approximately 65 M trainable parameters in the MiniMind-3V backbone and vision projection is fine-tuned with a multi-agent discrete action head that jointly predicts actions for all UAVs in a single forward pass. We identify a training–inference feature mismatch in behavior cloning and address it via prompt-end action pooling, which extracts action-relevant hidden states at the user–prompt boundary rather than after the generated response. In closed-loop evaluation with four drones and six mobile targets averaged over five evaluation seeds, MiniUAV-VLA reaches 74.4 ± 4.6% mission success against 9.4 ± 2.1% for a random policy and 16.2 ± 3.2% for an observation-limited greedy baseline. Across five independent training runs, prompt-end action pooling improves mean closed-loop success from 40.6% to 76.2% over the last-token alternative. These results support MARL expert distillation as a data-efficient route to compact multi-agent VLA control in this simulated setting.
RecoverFly is proposed, a failure-aware RL post-training framework for end-to-end UAV-VLA policies that adapts token-level RL for stable optimization of grammar-constrained autoregressive UAV actions, revisits unresolved failure cases to strengthen corrective learning and sample utilization, and combines a two-stage lo...
Boxiong Wang, Hui Kang, Geng Sun et al.· 0 citations
This work provides a feasible technical pathway and reproducible evaluation benchmark for the collaborative deployment of lightweight LLM planner, sub-goal guidance, sensor observations, cooperative reward, and reward shaping components and quantifies the indispensability of the LLM planner.
Yuting Cao, Zheng Zhao, Jiekai Wu et al.· Journal of King Saud Univers...· 0 citations
This work proposes ARIES-Mission2, a zero-shot Vision-Language-Action (VLA) framework that decouples visual-semantic perception from physical route optimization in low-altitude Unmanned Aerial Vehicle (UAV) mission generation and indicates that the TSP module maintains lower growth in computation time as the number of...
Jun-Hao Wei, Yan-Xiao Li, Hao-Chen Li et al.· 1 citation
FALCON-MASAC is presented, a safety-integrated multi-agent reinforcement learning framework that decomposes this task into four complementary layers: a hierarchical leader-follower paradigm that pairs a pre-trained virtual leader with followers learning a distributed cooperative policy, and a bypass-side commitment coo...
Yi-Ming Shang, Chang-Ping Du, Rui Yang et al.· Unmanned Systems· 0 citations
Deployable autonomy remains a key challenge for unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) operating in open-ended missions. Large language models (LLMs) and their multimodal variants, which can process visual and other sensory inputs, have introduced new capabilities for semantic perception, task reasoning, and language-conditio...
Ting-Quan Xiong, Jianning Zhan, Qiu-Wei Deng et al.· Drones· 0 citations
SLM-A* is designed as a language-native planning agent that can interoperate with multi-agent LLM frameworks as a callable planning sub-module, thus providing an architectural capability not available to conventional planners that operate on numerical graph representations.