The study argues that artificial intelligence should be integrated into a hybrid model that enriches the feedback process rather than replacing the teacher, and displays a division of labor across writing dimensions, complementing rather than replacing each other.
Abstract
Introduction:
Generative artificial intelligence tools such as ChatGPT are increasingly used to provide writing feedback, yet their effectiveness relative to teacher feedback and across distinct writing dimensions remains underexplored, particularly in languages other than English. This study compares the effects of ChatGPT-assisted feedback and teacher feedback on the writing achievement of B2-level learners of Turkish as a foreign language.
Methods:
An explanatory sequential mixed-methods design was adopted. The study group comprised 18 students enrolled at the Turkish Teaching Center (TÖMER) of Recep Tayyip Erdoğan University. Over an eight-week intervention, the experimental group (
n
= 9) received feedback through ChatGPT and the control group (
n
= 9) received feedback from the teacher, using an identical seven-category feedback guideline. Quantitative data were gathered through a pre-testpost-test control-group quasi-experimental design and analyzed with t-tests; qualitative data were obtained through a written process-evaluation form and analyzed thematically.
Results:
Writing achievement increased significantly in both groups, yet no significant difference emerged between the groups in their post-test scores. At the sub-dimension level, ChatGPT proved more effective in structural areas such as grammar, vocabulary, and spelling and punctuation, whereas the teacher held a clear advantage in inter-sentential planning and organization. The qualitative data indicated that ChatGPT fostered learner autonomy by lowering the anxiety of being evaluated, while the teacher was more capable of providing motivation and building contextual depth.
Discussion:
The two feedback sources are statistically equivalent overall but display a division of labor across writing dimensions, complementing rather than replacing each other. The study argues that artificial intelligence should be integrated into a hybrid model that enriches the feedback process rather than replacing the teacher.
The evidence suggests that ChatGPT cannot completely replace writing instructors, especially for low-proficiency learners, as over-reliance on AI may inhibit writing growth, but ChatGPT can still be used as a viable aid to correct errors and refine expressions to develop writing confidence, and advanced learners need t...
Chenlong Zhang· Journal of Contemporary Educ...· 0 citations
The results imply that the use of AI‑mediated feedback, when systematically integrated with teacher support, can be an effective and scalable way to advance EFL learners’ writing skills in similar contexts.
Abdullah Al Maqbali, O. Taga· Language, Technology, and So...· 0 citations
It is concluded that GenAI tends to produce a meaningful average improvement in EFL writing performance, but the outcome depends heavily on the conditions of use and on teacher guidance.
Budlan Namjil, Khulan Ojgoosh, Tsogzolmaa Guruuchin et al.· International journal of res...· 0 citations
Recommendations include integrating GenAI lessons into the syllabus and providing ChatGPT prompt writing training for both teachers and students to support students in note-taking practice.
N. Nguyen, Jacky-Lou Maestre, Alan Calder· The English Australia Journa...· 0 citations
It is suggested that while explainable ChatGPT effectively strengthens the understanding of specific, explained content, it does not confer immediate, generalized gains in metacognitive abilities or holistic writing outcomes.
Mohammad Mousazadeh· International Journal of Eng...· 0 citations
It can be concluded that the use of ChatGPT chatbot with the purpose of developing writing skills have positive and significant effects on the aspects of grammatical accuracy, lexical sophistication, and syntactic complexity.
Zeynep Yaprak· Journal of language research· 0 citations
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.