Aug 2026· Journal of Technology in Behavioral Science· 0 citations· 63 references
TL;DR
It is argued that, in this brief, online, non-clinical, single-session context, baseline AI acceptance explained more variance in immediate user-reported outcomes than the assigned identity disclosure label, suggesting pre-intervention education designed to improve user acceptance may benefit deployment efforts.
Abstract
As AI-driven chatbots increasingly support mental health interventions, understanding how their assigned disclosure label influences user experience is crucial. This mixed-methods study (
N
= 187; recruited via Prolific; ages 19–68; 52% female, 48% male - Given the sample’s concentration among Prolific users from South Africa and other English-speaking regions with relatively high digital literacy, transferability to broader clinical, cultural, and digital-access contexts should be interpreted cautiously).employs a randomized experimental design to test whether the assigned disclosure label (AI-Aware vs. Human-Unaware) and advice style (Empathetic vs. Rational), alongside users’ Theory of Change (ToC) and baseline AI acceptance, shape user perceived empathy, satisfaction, and session impact in a single-session mental health chatbot interaction. These null findings should be interpreted as the absence of statistically significant differences between assigned conditions in this specific design, rather than as evidence of equivalence or absence of psychological or relational effects. However, these null results must be interpreted with caution; the absence of explicit manipulation checks limits our ability to definitively conclude that the label successfully altered users’ internal beliefs about the agent’s true identity. In contrast, higher baseline AI acceptance robustly predicted greater perceived empathy and session impact, with an Acceptance × Disclosure interaction for empathy. Qualitatively, topic and sentiment patterns in conversation logs were highly similar across conditions. We argue that, in this brief, online, non-clinical, single-session context, baseline AI acceptance explained more variance in immediate user-reported outcomes than the assigned identity disclosure label. Practically, these findings suggest a hypothesis for future research: pre-intervention education designed to improve user acceptance may benefit deployment efforts, though this was not tested as a causal intervention here.
The analysis suggests that Riliv may offer stronger safeguards against self-diagnosis because its counseling services directly involve licensed Indonesian psychologists, and Wysa’s empathetic AI -generated responses may be interpreted by some users as validation of pre-existing diagnostic beliefs.
S. Savandha, Nakhma'ussolikhah, Nabilaa Faizatuz Zuhriyah et al.· 0 citations
Accuracy emerged as the strongest predictor of user trust, although participants did not consistently identify inaccurate advice, and Conversational tone appears to have limited influence, while disclaimers may not consistently promote appropriate caution.
Kerstin Denecke, E. Gabarron· Frontiers in Artificial Inte...· 0 citations
People’s understanding of psychotherapy influences their treatment expectations and engagement. Informed consent is often one of the first formal processes through which this understanding is shaped. Yet, little cross-cultural research has examined its impact on lay people’s pre-treatment attitudes. This study investig...
While ChatGPT was primarily viewed as an efficient tool in a work context, the quantitative survey reveals a weakly significant correlation between psychological stress and openness toward the social-emotional use of chatbots.
Stefanie Osetrow, H. Klapperich, A. Huldtgren· Message Understanding Confer...· 0 citations