Skip to content
#generative ai Open access

AI competency, attitudes, and experience as predictors of overall learning interaction via AI integration and creative tasks in GenAI-supported EFL classrooms

Aug 2026 · Scientific Reports · 0 citations

TL;DR

Qualitative evidence is provided that student’s AI-related characteristics may contribute to learning interaction through AI-supported learning practices and creative task involvement through AI-supported learning practices and creative task involvement.

Abstract

Although generative AI is increasingly integrated into higher education, its impact on student’s learning experience remains unclear. This study examined factors predicting learning interactions in EFL (English as a Foreign Language) contexts, focusing on student’s AI competency, attitudes, and experience. Grounded in constructivist theory and the WEST model (Will, Experience, Skill, and Tools), a questionnaire was administered to 884 students at a Chinese higher vocational college. Structural equation modeling shows that AI integration and involvement in creative tasks directly predict learning interaction, while competency, attitudes, and experience exert indirect effects via these variables. Theoretically, this study provides quantitative evidence that student’s AI-related characteristics may contribute to learning interaction through AI-supported learning practices and creative task involvement. In practice, students can be more active in classroom interactions by adopting AI tools and participating in appropriate creative tasks designed by their teachers. Consequently, teachers play an important role in determining how AI tools are integrated and what types of tasks are assigned to students in the English classroom to support a better interactive learning environment.

Read PDF

Similar papers

Open access Aug 2026

How Cognitive Factors and Motivation Shape Learners' Engagement in AI ‐Supported Language Learning?: Insights From the Combined SEM and fsQCA Approaches

These findings provide theoretical support for SCT in technology‐mediated learning and suggest practical strategies for educators, including tailoring instructional design to learners' cognitive profiles, fostering motivation and self‐efficacy and leveraging AI tools to enhance active and sustained engagement in langua...

Yifan Wang, Ran Zhi · 0 citations
Review Open access Aug 2026

AI Literacy and Self-Perceived Cognitive Learning Outcomes Among University Students in AI-Integrated Courses: Associations with Instructor Feedback and AI Use Indicators

The findings suggest that the quantity of AI use and learners’ competency to understand, evaluate, and self-regulate AI use are empirically distinct indicators that universities should measure separately.

Yu Eun Lee, Jinsook Kan · 0 citations
Review Open access Sep 2026

Modeling Students’ Intention to Use Generative AI in EFL Learning: The Roles of Prompt Engineering Competence, Motivational Identity, and Perceived Usability

The results indicate that both prompt engineering competence and motivational identity are associated with the perceived usability of AI tools (PUAI), which in turn predicts BI, suggesting that perceived usability mediated the relationships between prompt engineering competence, motivational identity, and behavioral in...

S. Alshammari, Amal Alhamazany · 0 citations
Open access Aug 2026

Generative AI, Bloom’s Higher-Order Thinking Skills, and Academic Achievement: The Mediating Role of Student Engagement in Higher Education

GenAI's impact on academic achievement is significantly channeled through enhanced student engagement rather than occurring solely through direct cognitive offloading, providing empirical evidence for shifting pedagogical strategies from passive AI consumption to structured, engagement-driven AI integration that explic...

Sidra Saeed, Hina Shaukat, Muhammad Minhass Baloch et al. · 0 citations
Review Sep 2026

Exploring AI-supported peer feedback in EFL writing: How do learners engage beyond the classroom?

Quantitative findings highlighted that AI tools were perceived as supportive in reducing peer pressure and promoting deeper revision strategies, but concerns about irrelevant or overly generic feedback pointed to the need for developing students’ critical awareness of AI support.

Ke Liu, Hong Liu · 0 citations

Related blog posts

Microsoft Research Blog Oct 7, 2026

Agent Lightning v1.0: A 3,500-Line Lightweight Agentic RL Framework for Training Agents with Real Harnesses

Training AI agents with reinforcement learning can be challenging because their tools, context, and decision-making are managed by complex frameworks. Agent Lightning connects existing agents to RL training, making it easier to improve them without rebuilding them. The post Agent Lightning v1.0: A 3,500-Line Lightweight Agentic RL Framework for Training Agents with Real Harnesses appeared first on Microsoft Research.

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.