Jan 2026· arXiv.org· Vol abs/2601.22118· 1 citation· 82 references
Computer Science
TL;DR
This paper presents a novel method for defining the ODD a posteriori from previously collected data using a multidimensional kernel-based representation that supports future certification of data-driven, safety-critical AI-based systems.
Abstract
Artificial Intelligence (AI) has been on the rise in many domains, including numerous safety-critical applications. However, for complex systems in the real world, defining the underlying environmental conditions in which the AI-based system must operate---the Operational Design Domain (ODD)---is extremely challenging. This often results in an incomplete description of the ODD, which contrasts with the requirements of many domains for certifying AI-based systems. Traditionally, the ODD is created in the early stages of the development process, drawing on sophisticated expert knowledge and related standards. This paper presents a novel method for defining the ODD a posteriori from previously collected data using a multidimensional kernel-based representation. This approach is validated through both synthetic benchmarks and a real-world aviation use case. Moreover, the paper defines similarity of two ODDs if they generate the same outputs up to Lebesgue-null input sets and proves convergence in volume of the calibrated representation under the stated assumptions. The novel, safety-by-design, deterministic kernel-based ODD representation is derived fully automatically, given documented assurance inputs, permutation-stable, bounded by construction, and, under affine-equivariant per-dimension normalization, invariant to the choice of units. Utilizing the proposed ODD representation supports future certification of data-driven, safety-critical AI-based systems.
This work presents a method for representativeness assessment of AI/ML constituent ODDs in the context of aviation safety assurance and illustrates how statistical distribution comparison methods can support the assessment of representativeness for safety-critical AI applications.
Thomas Stefani, J. Christensen, Elena Hoemann et al.· 0 citations
Artificial intelligence (AI) components are increasingly embedded in software, challenging established assumptions of software testing practice. This article presents a systematic mapping review of testing approaches for AI-based systems, grounded in ISO/IEC 29119 and ISO/IEC TR 29119-11. The contribution is a structur...
Lidija Vincekovič, Luka Pavlič, Tina Beranič· Applied Sciences· 0 citations
The conventional testing process quickly fails when applied to ML-based systems such as obstacle detection in vehicles: if an obstacle is not detected in a test, classical bug fixing is impossible and an AI system will always retain shortcomings. Test results can therefore only be interpreted statistically, which in tu...
It is asserted that trustworthiness is a systems property, not a single algorithmic feature, and that realising it requires coordinated advances in explainability, uncertainty quantification, human–AI interaction design, failure detection, and domain-specific data governance.
This work provides the first-ever open-source implementation of Safety Nets for HCAS and VCAS with replicable results, demonstrating a practical pathway toward certifiable AI-based systems in aviation and establishing Safety Nets as a viable Safety-by-Design solution for safety-critical applications.
J. Christensen, Thomas Stefani, Elena Hoemann et al.· 0 citations
Related blog posts
MIT News · Artificial Intelligence· news.mit.eduOct 13, 2026
Machine-learning networks can learn without detailed instructions from a designer. Those that do may offer insight into how the brain reorganizes itself during learning.
With $2.1 million funding from Google.org, the open-source Public Transit Intelligence Hub will unify public transit monitoring, operations, and passenger communication.