Skip to content

Real-life application of the Optical Beta-Adrenergic Sweat Test for people with cystic fibrosis.

Jul 2026 · Pulmonary Pharmacology & Therapeutics · Vol 94, pp. 102437 · 0 citations · 27 references
Medicine

TL;DR

SDN detected an earlier response to CFTR modulators, yielding lower p-values than the C/M rate ratio, particularly during ETI therapy, which provides a simpler and faster method than C/M ratio for monitoring the effects of CFTR modulators on CFTR function.

Abstract

Cystic fibrosis (CF) has become increasingly treatable with Cystic Fibrosis Transmembrane Conductance Regulator (CFTR)-targeted therapies. However, the availability and efficacy of these treatments depend on each patient's CFTR genotype, necessitating careful follow-up to detect effective benefits. This study builds on our previous findings by applying the Optical Beta-Adrenergic Sweat Test (OBAST) as a complement to the classical sweat Cl- testing (ST) to better evaluate the restoration of CFTR activity in vivo. We quantified the sweat droplet number (SDN) and the ratio between CFTR-dependent (beta-adrenergic Cocktail-induced, C-phase) and the CFTR-independent (Methacholine-induced, M-phase) sweat rates (C/M ratio) in 128 non-CF subjects and 143 people with CF (PwCF). Among the PwCF, 39 were treated with various combinations of the CFTR modulators, including Lumacaftor/Ivacaftor (LI), Tezacaftor/Ivacaftor (TI) and/or Elexacaftor/Tezacaftor/Ivacaftor (ETI). SDN detected an earlier response to CFTR modulators, yielding lower p-values than the C/M rate ratio, particularly during ETI therapy. Thus, SDN counting provides a simpler and faster method than C/M ratio for monitoring the effects of CFTR modulators on CFTR function, without compromising sensitivity or reliability. This enables more precise tracking of drug efficacy in individual subjects. In six PwCF, who underwent at least two different CFTR-targeted therapies, we also assessed lung function and nasal potential difference (NPD) in addition to ST, SDN, and the C/M ratio. We propose OBAST as a reliable complementary tool to standard tests, especially valuable when CFTR-targeted drugs are not approved for rare CFTR genotypes, when clinical response appears limited, and/or when sweat [Cl-] results are inconclusive.

View source

Similar papers

Case report Open access Aug 2026

Clinical benefit without sweat chloride response after ETI therapy in an adult with cystic fibrosis bearing the L467F;F508del complex CFTR allele: a case report and the role of AI-assisted chest CT in longitudinal monitoring

Persistent CFTR biomarker negativity may not fully exclude clinically meaningful ETI-associated benefit in rare or complex CFTR genotypes, and an exploratory in vitro rescue study with vanzacaftor/tezacaftor supports the evaluation of emerging CFTR modulators.

M. Kreslová, D. Caudri, Isabelle Sermet-Gaudelus et al. · 0 citations
Open access Aug 2026

Peripheral muscle dysfunction persists in the era of highly effective CFTR modulators in cystic fibrosis.

Altered muscle performance cannot be explained solely by muscle deconditioning and lower muscle size, suggesting intrinsic muscle alterations, and support the need for comprehensive assessment of peripheral muscle function and the continued prioritisation of interventions aiming to optimise muscle health.

A. Bronstein, Elise Zitta, O. Saidi et al. · 0 citations
Review Open access Aug 2026

Targeted Therapy for Restoring CFTR Activity: From Experimental to Clinical Features

The focus of this review is to describe and discuss the strategies for restoring the CFTR functional defects depending on the specific CFTR pathogenic variants, and the possible application of experimental and clinical drugs to CF treatment, which may allow improvements in patients’ quality of life and life expectancy.

Sara Allushi, M. Virgulti, Giovanna Blaconà et al. · 0 citations
Review

Journal of Cystic Fibrosis

Interim standards to guide healthcare professionals in the provision of variant-specific therapy for people with CF are produced, established using evidence from systematic reviews and expert opinion.

Kevin W. Southern, Carlo Castellani, E. Lammertyn et al. · 0 citations

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.