Skip to content

Dilemmas, Teleology, and Incomparable Value

Jul 2026 · Philosophy and Phenomenological Research · Vol 113, pp. 453 - 464 · 0 citations · 56 references

Abstract

Sometimes, it may seem that an agent faces an obligation dilemma—a situation in which they cannot fulfill their obligations no matter what they do. However, there are at least three problems for any theory that embraces obligation dilemmas. The logical problem arises from a conflict between obligation dilemmas and venerable principles of deontic logic. The teleological problem arises from a conflict between obligation dilemmas and the compelling thought that an agent is obligated to do what would be best. And the practical problem arises from a conflict between believing that one faces an obligation dilemma and making a coherent choice. In this essay, I argue that these problems can be solved.

View source

Similar papers

Open access Aug 2026

Elzenberg and Issues Discussed about Obligation

The paper presents the most important assumptions of Henryk Elzenberg’s formal axiology concerning the concepts of ought and obligation. For this purpose, the formal language of deontic logic was used. In this language, the HE theory was presented, which was characterized both from the syntactic and semantic side. Usin...

Marcin Drofiszyn · 0 citations
Open access Aug 2026

Moral uncertainty and imaginative resistance

There has been a recent surge of interest in normative internalism, according to which what you ought to do depends on your beliefs about morality. This view has potentially wide-reaching implications for practical action, policy choice, and societal norms. The view is motivated by certain compelling examples, but in...

Anna Mahtani · 0 citations
Aug 2026

Irreducible Causal Powers and Compatibilism

Many philosophers hold that free will consists in the exercise of an agent's irreducible causal powers. However, it is controversial whether a powers-based approach to free will is compatible with determinism or not. In two papers published in this journal, Mumford and Anjum (2014) and Conti (2025) offer opposite ans...

Qin-Cheng Yan · 0 citations
Open access Sep 2026

Can Reasons Be Irreducibly Relational?

The irreducibility thesis is the view that there are some reasons for action whose normative force is not explained by the value of the actions for which they are reasons, but which must instead be explained in terms of some relation between agents. This view has been developed influentially by Stephen Darwall, Marga...

James H. P. Lewis · 0 citations
Open access Sep 2026

Constructive Alternativism and the Assault on Truth

Constructive alternativism, the philosophical position that the universe is always open to alternate interpretations, can be seen as consistent with current political rhetoric stating that conservative operatives are considering “alternative facts”. In this paper, I argue that such an interpretation of constructive alt...

L. Leitner · 0 citations

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.