Sep 2026· EUR Research Repository (Erasmus University Rotterdam)
Abstract
Artificial Intelligence (AI) is increasingly embedded in organisational life, and this dissertation explores employees’ experience of AI in everyday work. It focuses on broad-application AI, commonly introduced through organisational initiatives led by HR, Learning & Development, or IT with the aim of supporting employees. Rather than approaching AI as a discrete tool with fixed effects, the dissertation examines unfolding relations in specific contexts and ask what matters in AI-inclusive work. This dissertation shows that AI applications are not merely sets of functionalities, but are inseparable from the situated context, shaping and being shaped by employees, work practices, and the organisational environment. It finds that conversational AI, using natural language instead of a menu-based interface for employee self-service, can contribute to a motivation and well-being supportive organisational environment by fostering greater autonomy, competence and relatedness. It also examines how employees interact with AI systems internal and external to their organisations (including unendorsed “shadow AI”), such as contextual search, content recommendations and generative AI in knowledge work. These interactions, shaped by past habits, present constraints and imagined futures, gradually reshape the boundaries of tasks, relationships and the meaning of work. Finally, the dissertation argues that different types of AI matter in different ways because they elicit different forms of engagement and different workplace experiences. Discriminative AI is positioned as a tool for the task, foregrounding efficiency and effectiveness, while also potentially giving rise to possible negative long-term experiences and raising questions about meaningful work. Generative AI is positioned as a medium for creative expression, foregrounding exploration, innovation, and creative actions, thereby fostering more creative and positive experiences at work. Overall, this dissertation offers insights for scholars and practitioners into emerging relations in AI-inclusive work, showing that the value and effects of AI do not reside in technology alone, but emerge through the relations among employees, AI characteristics and organisational context. In doing so, it offers a perspective that moves beyond short-term gains and highlights the longer-term value of creating work environments in which AI is experienced as useful, meaningful and supportive.
GAOKAO-Bench is introduced, an intuitive benchmark that employs questions from the Chinese GAOKAO examination as test samples, including both subjective and objective questions that contribute a robust evaluation benchmark for future large language models and offers valuable insights into the advantages and limitations of such models.
Xiaotian Zhang, Chun-yan Li, Yi Zong et al.· arXiv.org· 216 citations· ⚡17
Empirically, PRISM reduces the end-to-end time for data selection and model tuning to just 30% of conventional pipelines, and achieves this efficiency while simultaneously enhancing performance, surpassing models fine-tuned on the full dataset across eight multimodal and three language understanding benchmarks.
Jinhe Bi, Yifan Wang, Danqi Yan et al.· arXiv.org· 73 citations· ⚡4
The method, ECCOLA, is presented, which aims at making the high-level AI ethics principles more practical, making it possible for developers to more easily implement them in practice.
Ville Vakkuri, Kai-Kristian Kemell, P. Abrahamsson· EUROMICRO Conference on Soft...· 64 citations· ⚡6
In this paper, we present a novel approach to improving software quality and efficiency through a Large Language Model (LLM)-based model designed to review code and identify potential issues. Our proposed LLM-based AI agent model is trained on large code repositories. This training includes code reviews, bug reports, and documentation of best practices. It aims to detect code smells, identify potential bugs, provide suggestions for improvement, and optimize the code. Unlike traditional static code analysis tools, our LLM-based AI agent has the ability to predict future potential risks in the code. This supports a dual goal of improving code quality and enhancing developer education by encouraging a deeper understanding of best practices and efficient coding techniques. Furthermore, we explore the model's effectiveness in suggesting improvements that significantly reduce post-release bugs and enhance code review processes, as evidenced by an analysis of developer sentiment toward LLM feedback. For future work, we aim to assess the accuracy and efficiency of LLM-generated documentation updates in comparison to manual methods. This will involve an empirical study focusing on manually conducted code reviews to identify code smells and bugs, alongside an evaluation of best practice documentation, augmented by insights from developer discussions and code reviews. Our goal is to not only refine the accuracy of our LLM-based tool but also to underscore its potential in streamlining the software development lifecycle through proactive code improvement and education.
Z. Rasheed, Malik Abdul Sami, Muhammad Waseem et al.· arXiv.org· 62 citations· ⚡3
This paper designs Markov decision processes (MDPs) for different combinatorial problems and proposes to train conditional GFlowNets to sample from the solution space and demonstrates that GFlowNet policies can efficiently find high-quality solutions.
Dinghuai Zhang, H. Dai, Esmeralda S. Whitammer et al.· Advances in Neural Informati...· 59 citations· ⚡8
An empirical study on the current state of practice in artificial intelligence ethics is conducted by means of a multiple case study of five case companies, which indicates a gap between research and practice in the area.
Ville Vakkuri, Kai-Kristian Kemell, Joni Kultanen et al.· arXiv.org· 56 citations· ⚡6
The professor of physics and inaugural director of the NSF AI Institute for Artificial Intelligence and Fundamental Interactions will lead LNS and continue his research in particle physics.