BUZZY: Contrastive Scoring to Mitigate Text-Induced Bias in Multimodal Multiple-Choice QA
TL;DR
This work hypothesizes and empirically verify that a model genuinely relies on visual evidence only when its multimodal distribution significantly diverges from its text-only distribution and proposes BUZZY, a training-free decoding method that corrects multimodal predictions by subtracting the text-only distribution.
Abstract
Multimodal multiple-choice question answering (MCQA) provides a standardized and objectively measurable setting for evaluating vision-language models (VLMs). However, because the MCQA format incorporates the candidate choices into the input context, it introduces several unintended biases. Previous work has primarily focused on structural biases, such as preferences for certain choices. Instead, we argue that the choices act as textual priors, causing models to favor linguistically plausible options regardless of the visual content. We hypothesize and empirically verify that a model genuinely relies on visual evidence only when its multimodal distribution significantly diverges from its text-only distribution. Based on this observation we propose BUZZY,a training-free decoding method that corrects multimodal predictions by subtracting the text-only distribution. Experiments with five VLMs on five multimodal MCQA benchmarks demonstrate that BUZZY achieves the highest average accuracy among state-of-the-art methods while reducing inference latency by over 28% compared to prior contrastive decoding approaches. Overall, these results suggest that amplifying the visual signal by penalizing text-only preferences is key to efficient and robust multimodal MCQA reasoning. Code and additional resources are provided https://txxnrd.github.io/buzzy/.
