Skip to content
#computer vision Preprint

A Unifying Perspective on Causal World Models: From Observations to Representations to Structure

Aug 2026 · 0 citations · 30 references
Computer Science

TL;DR

This paper provides a formal definition of Causal WMs (CWMs) grounded in the tasks they are intended to support, connecting existing work in causal representation learning, object-centric learning, causal discovery, structural causal models, and model-based decision-making.

Abstract

World Models (WM) are increasingly seen as a foundation for intelligent agents that can predict, plan, and act beyond their training distribution. In this paper, we study WMs from a causal perspective across multiple levels of abstraction, ranging from perceptual observations to building a conceptual representation of the structure governing the environment dynamics. We argue that useful WMs must go beyond generative capabilities alone: they should also capture entity properties, entity-to-entity interactions, and entity-to-environment interactions that determine and explain the dynamics of a system. We provide a formal definition of Causal WMs (CWMs) grounded in the tasks they are intended to support, connecting world modelling with existing work in causal representation learning, object-centric learning, causal discovery, structural causal models, and model-based decision-making. Finally, we relate CWMs to the literature on identifiability, clarifying when the components of a WM can be recovered from data and up to which equivalence. With this, we ground WMs in representations and structures that support causal reasoning and informed decision-making.

View source

Similar papers

Jul 2026

Mental World Modeling

World models enable a predictive substrate for planning and action, yet existing formulations merely answer a physical question: what/where it is, and how will it evolve. Human behavior, however, is driven by hidden mental state (what a person believes, wants, intends, feels, and considers socially permissible), so a m...

Hao Fei, Yiran Zhao · 1 citation
Preprint Aug 2026

Predictive Set Theory: A Generative Framework for Cognitive Architecture with Operationalized Core Mechanisms

Predictive Set Theory is introduced, a formal generative framework that reconstructs cognitive architecture from first principles that offers novel resolutions to classical problems such as Russell's paradox, the cognitive status of G\"{o}delian incompleteness, the grounding of negative feedback, and the comprehension...

Yiyang Yu · 0 citations
Preprint Aug 2026

Causal Reasoning with Bipartite Graphical Causal Models

This work proposes bipartite graphical causal models (BGCMs), in which the structure of a system of equations is encoded by a bipartite graph with variable and equation nodes, and forms a Markov property in terms of a new graphical separation criterion (B-separation) that exploits the functional determinism inherent in...

J. Mooij · 0 citations
Review Aug 2026

Human-Centric Intelligence in the Era of Foundation Models: A Survey

A full-spectrum human context taxonomy is introduced that integrates six interconnected levels by viewing humans as observable subjects through visual appearance and spatial geometry, as dynamic actors through kinematic dynamics and interaction modeling, and as situated agents through world simulation and embodied agen...

Yang Chen, Tianqi Wang, Xiao-Wen Jiang et al. · 0 citations
Review Open access Jul 2026

Causal Post-hoc XAI: Categorisation and Systematic Literature Review

This work presents a comprehensive literature review of the current state of the subfield of XAI that consist of causality-motivated post-hoc XAI methods, and a causal framework for categorising XAI is introduced, and three types of post-hoc XAI methods are identified: observational methods, internally causal methods a...

Anna Rodum Bjøru, Helge Langseth, Inga Strümke et al. · 1 citation
Preprint Aug 2026

GENESIS: Towards Explainable Causal Discovery

Causal Discovery (CD) from observational data faces two fundamental challenges. First, purely statistical methods often lack the power to resolve structural ambiguities in low-sample regimes. Second, although LLM-assisted hybrid approaches improve structure recovery through semantic reasoning, the influence of that rea...

A. Thorat, Ravi Kolla, Vishak K Bhat et al. · 0 citations

Related blog posts

Microsoft Research Blog Oct 6, 2026

What AI gets wrong and what failure teaches us

Jennifer Neville did not want to go into computer science—but that’s exactly where she landed. Neville discusses the starts and stops that led to her professional sweet spot and her work identifying “surprising failures” making it hard for AI to handle complexity.  The post What AI gets wrong and what failure teaches us appeared first on Microsoft Research.

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.