This study provides a comprehensive industry-grounded overview of ADS testing, proposes an evidence-centered closed-loop testing framework to provide actionable guidance for ADS testing, and outlines important directions for future research and practice.
Abstract
Autonomous driving systems (ADS) are rapidly advancing and increasingly deployed in real-world applications. This creates growing demands for effective testing to ensure system functionality and safety. However, ADS testing remains complex and lacks well-established standards for scenario selection, performance evaluation, and acceptance criteria. To better understand current ADS testing practices and challenges, we conducted an interview study with experts working on ADS development and testing in nine companies from six different countries. Through thematic analysis, we synthesized industrial testing practices, challenges, potential solutions, future trends, and proposed an evidence-centered closed-loop testing framework for ADS testing. Our findings show that current practices primarily focus on scenario-based and X-in-the-loop testing approaches, supported by diverse tools, metrics, benchmarks, and testing strategies. The participants highlighted major challenges related to scenario realism, scenario coverage, simulation fidelity, and acceptance criteria, while also discussing potential solutions such as the use of AI, world models, and end-to-end approaches. Furthermore, participants envisioned future ADS testing to become more automated, data-driven, and transparent across the industry. Overall, this study provides a comprehensive industry-grounded overview of ADS testing, proposes an evidence-centered closed-loop testing framework to provide actionable guidance for ADS testing, and outlines important directions for future research and practice.
Simulation is increasingly used to support safety-related decision-making in road transport, particularly for the assessment and approval of automated driving systems (ADS). The complexity of ADS behavior and size of their operational design domains make exclusive reliance on physical testing impractical, leading to ex...
R. Donà, Espedito Rusciano, B. Ciuffo· 0 citations
This study compared three test environments — real traffic, an MRV setup, and a high-fidelity driving simulator — in evaluating a novel driver assistance system and demonstrated absolute validity in measuring cognitive load and acceptance (usefulness) of the system.
Chantal Himmels, Paula Santos, Kai-Feng Liu et al.· Proceedings of the 18th Inte...· 0 citations
Professional truck drivers represent a critical yet under-researched user group of automotive human-machine interfaces (HMIs). Adaptive HMIs support decision-making in demanding driving contexts. However, research on adaptive truck HMIs remains limited, particularly regarding adequate user control for expert drivers. T...
Anna Eckl, Lena Stütz, Lara Follert et al.· Proceedings of the 18th Inte...· 0 citations
This review examines factors, methodologies, and evaluation techniques for passenger comfort in autonomous vehicles (AVs). Current research in this area is often fragmented and inappropriately extrapolates methodologies from traditional vehicle studies without accounting for the unique constraints of driverless travel,...
Liu Yang, Xin Zhang, Hui Zhang et al.· Ergonomics· 0 citations
This framework outlines a potential pathway for advancing DSM technology toward more proactive and personalized intelligent assistance, while acknowledging that realizing this transition will require sustained interdisciplinary effort.