Sep 2026· Journal of the Knowledge Economy· 0 citations· 21 references
Abstract
As Industry 5.0 advances, artificial intelligence (AI) is increasingly positioned as a driver of sustainability in knowledge-based economies; however, empirical outcomes remain uneven and frequently symbolic. Addressing this paradox, this paper examines AI-driven sustainability through the lens of knowledge creation, governance, and application, rather than technological capability alone. Using a Critical Interpretive Synthesis, the paper systematically analyses interdisciplinary literature on AI, Industry 5.0, sustainability, and leadership to move beyond descriptive aggregation toward theory development. The findings reconceptualise AI as a knowledge infrastructure whose sustainability value depends on how AI-generated knowledge is governed, interpreted, and applied across systems. The paper further advances theory by reframing responsible leadership as a knowledge-governance mechanism, explaining how leadership shapes the prioritisation and diffusion of AI-enabled knowledge across micro (individual), meso (organisational/industry), and macro (institutional) levels. Building on these insights, the paper develops an integrative framework that explains why AI-enabled sustainability initiatives often result in performative environmental, social, and governance (ESG) compliance rather than substantive environmental and social impact. By linking responsible leadership with AI knowledge governance, the paper contributes to the knowledge-economy literature by explaining variability in sustainability outcomes beyond technological adoption. The paper concludes by outlining implications for organisational governance and identifying directions for future empirical research to test and extend the proposed framework.
GAOKAO-Bench is introduced, an intuitive benchmark that employs questions from the Chinese GAOKAO examination as test samples, including both subjective and objective questions that contribute a robust evaluation benchmark for future large language models and offers valuable insights into the advantages and limitations...
Xiaotian Zhang, Chun-yan Li, Yi Zong et al.· arXiv.org· 216 citations· ⚡17
This work investigates the possibilities of using LLMs in a resume screening setting via a document retrieval framework that simulates job candidate selection and finds that the MTEs are biased, significantly favoring White-associated names in 85% of cases and female-associated names in only 11.1% of cases.
This work shows that orders of magnitude enhancement in performance could be obtained by a combination of hardware improvements and tight quantum-HPC integration and introduces high-performance architectures for quantum-probabilistic computing with custom-designed accelerators to tackle today's industry-scale classical...
Masoud Mohseni, Artur Scherer, K. Johnson et al.· arXiv.org· 121 citations· ⚡9
This paper presents a comprehensive overview of the Ultralytics YOLO family, emphasizing architectural evolution, benchmarking, deployment, and emerging directions from YOLOv5 through YOLO27, and examines detection, segmentation, depth, classification, pose, oriented detection, tracking, export, quantization, and deplo...
This work revisits schema linking when using the latest generation of large language models (LLMs) and finds empirically that newer models are adept at utilizing relevant schema elements during generation even in the presence of large numbers of irrelevant ones.
Karime Maamari, Fadhil Abubaker, Daniel Jaroslawicz et al.· arXiv.org· 109 citations· ⚡19
A novel threat is unveiled in which attackers steer the RAG system's response by injecting malicious passages into its knowledge base, enabling the attacker to steer the response without altering the user input or modifying the RAG weights.
Jiaqi Xue, Meng Zheng, Yebowen Hu et al.· arXiv.org· 109 citations· ⚡8
Related blog posts
MIT News · Artificial Intelligence· news.mit.eduSep 30, 2026
With $2.1 million funding from Google.org, the open-source Public Transit Intelligence Hub will unify public transit monitoring, operations, and passenger communication.