Host-encoded Gag CA proteins may offer complementary features such as lower immunogenicity, flexible cargo capacity, and tissue-specific targeting, and open questions remain regarding release and cellular entry mechanisms, in vivo tropism, determinants of immunogenicity across family members, and safety.
Abstract
Domesticated gag genes derived from long terminal repeat (LTR) retrotransposons are widespread in mammals and occur in other metazoans, including Drosophila and zebrafish. Their protein products commonly contain a capsid (CA) domain, and many retain the ability to assemble capsid-like particles that package RNA, and potentially other biomolecules, with emerging roles in intercellular communication, neuronal signaling, placental gene regulation, and fertility. Biochemical, genetic, and structural studies have identified the core domains that are necessary and sufficient for capsid formation, even in the absence of accessory proteins. Several systems also exhibit selective self-RNA packaging directed by cis elements, suggesting rules that could be harnessed for programmable cargo selection. Building on this foundation, recent efforts have developed host-encoded Gag CA proteins for delivery applications, ranging from engineered systems to approaches that exploit naturally preloaded capsids. In addition to established platforms such as adeno-associated viruses (AAVs), lipid nanoparticles (LNPs), and nonintegrating lentiviral systems, domesticated Gag CA proteins may offer complementary features such as lower immunogenicity, flexible cargo capacity, and tissue-specific targeting. Open questions remain regarding release and cellular entry mechanisms, in vivo tropism, determinants of immunogenicity across family members, and safety.
Transposable elements are abundant in host genomes but are generally considered to be confined to the cell in which they are expressed, with the notable exception of endogenous retroviruses. Here, we identify a group of long terminal repeat (LTR) retrotransposons that infect the germline from somatic cells within the D...
Maya Voichek, A. Bernhard, Lea Lauterjung et al.· Cell· 1 citation
This work provides a conceptual and practical framework for targeting recoding-dependent gene products such as PEG10 in disease and suggests broader applicability of structure-directed ASOs to viral and cellular frameshifting elements.
Ondrej Kostov, Myriam Moreno Swanton, Katie R. Waldon et al.· bioRxiv· 0 citations
Extracellular vesicles (EVs), particles released from cells, have the potential to become an important in vivo delivery vehicle for CRISPR machinery. Unlike viral vectors such as Adeno-associated virus (AAV), EVs reduce risks associated with immunogenicity, long-term expression, and potential off-target effects. EVs ca...
Peter Pečan, Mateja Manček-Keber· Methods in molecular biology· 0 citations
This article aims to provide a working framework for verifying the potency, genomic integrity, and clinical safety of vector-based gene therapies—one intended to be useful both to laboratories developing these products and to those responsible for regulating them.
Yusra A. Radeef, Z. Abdullah, E. F. A. Awadh· International Journal of Mul...· 0 citations
This work demonstrates how proteins created by generative artificial intelligence can be harnessed for the rational engineering of RNA transport systems with the desired properties by overcoming the limitations of natural protein diversity.
Maren Kirstin Schuhmacher, Christoph Gruber, Christopher M. R. Lang et al.· Nature· 1 citation
Genome editing based on engineered CRISPR systems is advancing rapidly, with the field increasingly moving toward approaches that avoid the induction of mutagenic double-stranded DNA breaks (e.g., RNA-programmable base editing, prime editing, and donor DNA transposition). These nuclease-free strategies often rely on la...
Xiao-Lin Wang, Jin Liu, J. Janssen et al.· Methods in molecular biology· 0 citations
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.