Aug 2026· IJGIE (International Journal of Graduate of Islamic Education)· Vol 7, pp. 985-1001· 0 citations· 56 references
TL;DR
It is indicated that automated corrective feedback can extend listening practice beyond limited class time, yet higher-order inference still depends on teacher mediation, and AI-assisted corrective feedback is therefore best positioned as a teacher-supervised supplement in future language learning.
Abstract
Listening receives limited class time at the senior high school level, and large classes rarely allow teachers to give personal written feedback on students’ open-ended answers. Web-based listening tools and AI scoring systems both exist, but the two are seldom integrated so that learners receive immediate corrective feedback on free-text listening responses. This study addressed that gap by developing and testing a web-based learning system assisted by artificial intelligence (AI), and it examined both the feasibility and the effectiveness of the product. The Research and Development method was applied through the Integrative Learning Design Framework across three phases, namely exploration, enactment, and evaluation. The product is a website named Ear Up! that delivers CEFR-graded audio lessons, collects essay answers, and uses an OpenAI GPT-4o model to return automated corrective feedback and next-lesson recommendations. The system was trialed with 28 tenth-grade students. Expert and user evaluation produced a mean feasibility score of 4.67 out of 5, in the very feasible band. Under a one-group pretest-posttest design, listening for details improved at a medium level (N-gain = 0.67) and listening for inference at a low level (N-gain = 0.25), while classical mastery rose from 29.41% to 82.35% and from 32.35% to 67.65%. The findings indicate that automated corrective feedback can extend listening practice beyond limited class time, yet higher-order inference still depends on teacher mediation. AI-assisted corrective feedback is therefore best positioned as a teacher-supervised supplement in future language learning.
Evidence supports a pedagogy-first model in which AI augments rather than substitutes for teacher judgement, materials are grounded in curricular sources, outputs are verified, students are taught to interrogate AI responses, and use is age-appropriate and governed by clear data and accountability rules.
Nibedita Sarma· Asian Journal of Education a...· 0 citations
Remote laboratory environments are increasingly central to distance and online STEM education, yet students often lack access to immediate, situated tutor support during live experimental activity. This paper presents OELAssist, an AI-driven adaptive support system designed to provide real-time, context-aware feedback...
Dhouha Kbaier, Andrew Mason· Ubiquity Proceedings· 0 citations
Peer feedback promotes active learning, critical reflection, and skill development, but its effectiveness is often limited by the quality of feedback students provide. Recent advances in LLMs offer new opportunities to support peer feedback by generating more coherent and actionable feedback while preserving human over...
Álvaro Becerra, A. Palma, Ruth Cobos et al.· 0 citations
This study investigates how human-AI collaboration can improve feedback quality and learning efficiency in skill-based classroom instruction. The study is designed to involve approximately 520 students and 36 instructors from practice-oriented courses over a 12-week teaching cycle, generating around 7,800 student pract...
Jia-Hui Lim, Wei Tan, N. Rahman· Journal of Adaptive Learning...· 0 citations
The findings indicate that audio-based AI interventions generally contribute positively to cognitive outcomes, motivation, and engagement, particularly by enabling frequent, personalised feedback and flexible, on-the-go learning opportunities.
Muhammd Fauzan Hawari, Afifah Mesha Putri, Akmal Andri Yantama et al.· Business System & Innova...· 0 citations