Skip to content

Metanormative Theory for RL-Based Moral Agents

Aug 2026 · 0 citations · 50 references
Computer Science

TL;DR

This paper aims to draw out ideas from recent work in metanormative theory that can be useful for designing artificial moral and value-aligned agents and examine the RL architecture through the lens of these ideas.

Abstract

The overlapping disciplines of machine ethics and value alignment are concerned with designing artificial agents that are aligned with human values and that act in ethically acceptable ways. A recent trend in these disciplines is the use of reinforcement learning (RL) to design such agents, sidelining the philosophical literature that used to play a more central role. Against this backdrop, this paper pursues two goals. The first is to draw out ideas from recent work in metanormative theory that can be useful for designing artificial moral and value-aligned agents. The second is to examine the RL architecture through the lens of these ideas. This will give us clearer criteria for when an RL agent's behavior can be classified as moral, as well as a basis for evaluating and comparing different RL-based approaches to machine ethics and value alignment.

View source

Similar papers

#generative ai Open access Sep 2026

Simulated Morality, Misplaced Trust: The Risks of Treating AI as a Moral Partner

The article proposes a reframing of alignment from an ethical-pedagogical project to an institutional one: instead of presuming or attempting to cultivate artificial moral agents on the basis of behavioral proxies, governance should focus on designing legal, technical, and organizational structures that constrain and r...

Saša Josifović · 0 citations
Open access Sep 2026

Hegemonikon and AI

The Stoic concept of the hegemonikon—the capacity for assent that directs the mind—is used as a framework for understanding intellectual creation and decision-making, clarifying when AI supports human judgment and when it replaces decision-making authority.

Christos A. Koutsotasios, Elias Vavouras · 0 citations
Open access Aug 2026

Beyond Consequentialist Ethics

In order to live well in an AI-based society, designing technically ethical systems, in the spirit of consequentialism, is not enough; rather, it is essential to cultivate citizens who, as AI users, are endowed with virtues and, first and foremost, the virtue of prudence.

Josep Del-Hierro-Dies, J. Sánchez-Cañizares · 0 citations
Open access Sep 2026

A coevolutionary account of normative human–AI interaction

It is argued that the integration of aligned large language models into social practice reshapes the structure of moral agency itself, embedding derivative normative orientations that recursively feed back into human moral formation.

J. Noller · 0 citations
Preprint Aug 2026

A Fair Objective for Human-Empowerment-Preserving AI: Desiderata, Design, and Likely Behavioral Consequences

This paper explores the idea of promoting well-being and safety in human-AI interactions by forcing AI agents explicitly to empower humans and to manage the power balance between humans and AI agents in a desirable way. Using a principled, partially axiomatic approach based on desirable properties, we design a parametr...

J. Heitzig, Ram Potham · 0 citations

Related blog posts

Microsoft Research Blog Oct 12, 2026

Simulating student learning for better AI tutoring

StudentSim is a research system for evaluating and improving AI tutoring tools before they are tested with learners. It models how individuals may engage with tutors, giving feedback to improve tutor performance across subjects like chess, writing, and mathematics. The post Simulating student learning for better AI tutoring appeared first on Microsoft Research.

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.