Aug 2026· International Journal for Educational Integrity· Vol 22· 0 citations· 35 references
TL;DR
It can be concluded that the students’ view of GenAI can shape their ethical use of these tools, which requires prioritizing awareness raising, developing policy frameworks, and monitoring policy reinforcement.
Abstract
The rapid expansion of generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) has increased concerns about academic integrity in higher education, reshaping the way it was previously conceptualized. As GenAI becomes more prevalent, an in-depth understanding of students’ perspectives appears to be crucial to navigate the ethical use of the innovation. The objective of this study is, therefore, to explore students’ perspectives of academic integrity issues regarding the use of GenAI, focusing on plagiarism, originality, and the fairness of academic assessment results. This study utilized a qualitative research approach, based on a reflexive thematic method. The participants of this study are undergraduate students from Ambo University. The result of the study is unexpectedly paradoxical. GenAI tools have emerged as an essential revolution to improve student academic engagement. They offer students several perceived benefits, such as overcoming language barriers, access to up-to-date resources, and improved academic support. However, a serious concern arises as a substantial number of students are positive about using GenAI and relying on it for coursework as a minor violation. It is also noted that GenAI creates uneven playing fields between students who genuinely work on their own efforts and those who submit work generated by GenAI. Finally, it can be concluded that the students’ view of GenAI can shape their ethical use of these tools, which requires prioritizing awareness raising, developing policy frameworks, and monitoring policy reinforcement. The study may contribute to the quality of education by addressing issues related to academic integrity in the post-digital world.
The rapid integration of generative AI in higher education has sparked intense debate regarding its potential to undermine student ethics. While concerns about academic dishonesty abound, empirical evidence linking AI dependency to actual integrity levels remains scarce, particularly in EFL contexts. Grounded in Academ...
Nida Hasanah Putri, N. Suryati· ELT Forum: Journal of Englis...· 0 citations
Since the emergence of ChatGPT in 2022, teaching and learning practices at universities have undergone significant changes, particularly in academic writing (Hasanein & Sobaih, 2023). The growing use of ChatGPT among university students has raised concerns about academic integrity and the credibility of university degr...
Nayyer Hassan, M. Ambreen, Rida Zainab et al.· Qlantic Journal of Social Sc...· 0 citations
The findings reveal that GenAI plays a dual, context-dependent role, particularly by supporting idea generation, material development, and pedagogical innovation, and suggests that GenAI should be used as a collaborative tool.
Student engagement in developing open educational resources (OER; openly licensed materials without fees to access) may be critically important for sustainable higher education and for developing important skills. There has been substantial debate about the use of generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) for the sust...
Virginia Clinton-Lisell· Sustainability· 0 citations
This study explored how a higher education educator experienced and made sense of generative artificial intelligence within teaching, peer collaboration, and assessment practices, and identified three superordinate themes, including divergent peer adoption of GenAI, pedagogical adaptation and uncertainty, and assessmen...
Karen K. Fujii, N. Perez· IAFOR Journal of Education· 0 citations
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.