Skip to content

WRRA Core 1.0: A Domain-Agnostic Execution Architecture

Sep 2026 · Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)

Abstract

WRRA Core 1.0 defines a frozen, domain-agnostic execution architecture derived from Minimal Computing Cosmology but independent of any specific physical theory or application. Its three constitutional invariants are Minimum Viable Computation, Common Carrier, and Phenotype. These are combined with the Fixed-Present, Ownership, Boundary, Renderer, Record/Ledger, and Fail-Closed principles to describe how a system receives a SOURCE, organizes RELATIONS and STATE, preserves past effects as present RESIDUE or RECORD, updates the next present through reusable carriers, and renders observable PHENOTYPES.The document separates the invariant WRRA Core from changeable Domain Profiles, so revisions in cosmology, physics, biology, artificial intelligence, economics, meteorology, mathematics, or methodology do not automatically require a revision of the Core. It also records the complete WRRA application lineage through 7 September 2026, including WRRA-Physics and Minimal Computing Cosmology, WRRA-Bio, WRRA-Cell, WRRA-AI, WRRA-Worm, WRRA-Econ, WRRA-Met, WRRA-Math/WJNS, and the Interpretation–Prediction Boundary framework.The specification provides formal execution equations, ownership rules, validation contracts, domain mappings, minimum conformance conditions, a Core checklist, version-control rules, and a standard template for constructing future WRRA Domain Profiles. Claims are explicitly separated into interpretation, computation, prediction, control, and OPEN states to prevent structural models from being misrepresented as empirical validation. WRRA Core 1.0 is therefore presented as a reusable audit grammar for complex systems: how they execute the present, transport information and resources, generate observable expressions, preserve records, and distinguish minimally sufficient structure from both deficiency and excess.

View source

Similar papers

#artificial intelligence Open access May 2023

Evaluating the Performance of Large Language Models on GAOKAO Benchmark

GAOKAO-Bench is introduced, an intuitive benchmark that employs questions from the Chinese GAOKAO examination as test samples, including both subjective and objective questions that contribute a robust evaluation benchmark for future large language models and offers valuable insights into the advantages and limitations...

Xiaotian Zhang, Chun-yan Li, Yi Zong et al. · 216 citations · ⚡17
#artificial intelligence Open access Jul 2024

Gender, Race, and Intersectional Bias in Resume Screening via Language Model Retrieval

This work investigates the possibilities of using LLMs in a resume screening setting via a document retrieval framework that simulates job candidate selection and finds that the MTEs are biased, significantly favoring White-associated names in 85% of cases and female-associated names in only 11.1% of cases.

Kyra Wilson, Aylin Caliskan · 131 citations · ⚡8
#artificial intelligence Review Nov 2024

How to Build a Quantum Supercomputer: Scaling from Hundreds to Millions of Qubits

This work shows that orders of magnitude enhancement in performance could be obtained by a combination of hardware improvements and tight quantum-HPC integration and introduces high-performance architectures for quantum-probabilistic computing with custom-designed accelerators to tackle today's industry-scale classical...

Masoud Mohseni, Artur Scherer, K. Johnson et al. · 121 citations · ⚡9
#artificial intelligence Review Oct 2025

Ultralytics YOLO Evolution: An Overview of YOLO26, YOLO11, YOLOv8 and YOLOv5 Object Detectors for Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition

This paper presents a comprehensive overview of the Ultralytics YOLO family, emphasizing architectural evolution, benchmarking, deployment, and emerging directions from YOLOv5 through YOLO27, and examines detection, segmentation, depth, classification, pose, oriented detection, tracking, export, quantization, and deplo...

Ranjan Sapkota, Manoj Karkee · 112 citations · ⚡10

The Death of Schema Linking? Text-to-SQL in the Age of Well-Reasoned Language Models

This work revisits schema linking when using the latest generation of large language models (LLMs) and finds empirically that newer models are adept at utilizing relevant schema elements during generation even in the presence of large numbers of irrelevant ones.

Karime Maamari, Fadhil Abubaker, Daniel Jaroslawicz et al. · 109 citations · ⚡19

BadRAG: Identifying Vulnerabilities in Retrieval Augmented Generation of Large Language Models

A novel threat is unveiled in which attackers steer the RAG system's response by injecting malicious passages into its knowledge base, enabling the attacker to steer the response without altering the user input or modifying the RAG weights.

Jiaqi Xue, Meng Zheng, Yebowen Hu et al. · 109 citations · ⚡8

Related blog posts

MIT News · Artificial Intelligence Sep 29, 2026

Who we become when we talk to machines

Professor Sherry Turkle’s new book, “Artificial Intimacy,” offers a withering critique of chatbots and the antisocial dynamics she believes they encourage.

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.