The Australian Curriculum: Technologies has been designed in response to pressing national priorities, including food and water security, population health and wellbeing, the growth of the knowledge economy, and the continual transformation of engineering and manufacturing. These priorities underpin the inclusion of two central subjects—Design and Technologies and Digital Technologies—supported by contextual applications across the Foundation Primary year to Year 10. The curriculum is intended not only to be comprehensive but also integrative, fostering meaningful cross-disciplinary connections that provide opportunities for innovation in areas such as food and fibre production and Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics (STEM).
This paper synthesises key elements of the Australian Curriculum: Technologies and the Digital Literacy general capability, with a particular focus on building a future-resilient curriculum. When developing these documents, international policy frameworks and research perspectives were considered, highlighting the global importance of digital literacy as a threshold capability for lifelong learning.
This paper also examines the challenges posed by declining ICT literacy in Australian students, the evolution from the ICT capability to the Digital Literacy capability, and the conceptual pillars of Computational, Design, and Systems Thinking. Attention is given to the importance of a whole-school approach to implementation, the need for teacher professional learning, and the integration of ethical, sustainable, and futures-focussed practices. Ultimately, this paper argues that the Australian Curriculum: Technologies is central to preparing young Australians, not only for probable futures, but also to equip them to shape their own preferred futures that are sustainable, ethical, and adaptable to rapid technological change.
In a time of rapid technological and societal transformation, universities are called upon to prepare future engineers not only for professional success, but also for their societal responsibilities. In addition to technical expertise, engineers need ethical awareness, sustainability competencies, and the ability to re...
Maria Derda, M. Wedel· Athens Journal of Τechnology...· 0 citations
The global “education for sustainable development” (ESD) campaign is premised on the idea that a sustainable future may be attained if people are adequately educated. But this premise ignores a widespread modern perception: that the future, particularly in relation to environmental challenges, is unshapable and predete...
Mahmoud Mohammad Mahmoud Al Qerom, Khamis K. Al-karawi, Leona Adimchi Eke· Journal of Societal Sustaina...· 0 citations
Persistent structural inequalities continue to limit equitable access to, and success within, South African higher education, particularly for students from historically marginalised and under-resourced schooling backgrounds. Extended Curriculum Programmes (ECPs) were introduced as a national policy response to these d...
Andisiwe Dumako, O. Oguntona, C. Aigbavboa· The 1st International Online...· 0 citations
Education 4.0 frameworks position adaptive personalization, intelligent learning pathways, and competency-based design as structural pillars of the emerging learning ecosystem. Yet a persistent gap in this literature concerns whose learning these architectures are built to serve. By centering technological capacity and...
Climate change demonstrates one of the most crucial global predicaments of the 21st century, necessitating imperative educational responses to capacitate learners with the information, aptitudes, and principles essential for sustainable action. Its infusion into the school curriculum is disjointed and inadequately coor...
Samkelo Prince Nkwanyana, Samantha Govender, K. Mpuangnan· Veredas do Direito· 0 citations
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.