Skip to content

Category

natural language processing

9,261 papers

#artificial intelligence Preprint Oct 2026

Librarian Agents: Training LLMs to Curate Long-Context Workspaces that Anticipate Future Queries

Reasoning over long document contexts remains a challenge for large language models (LLMs). Standard retrieval methods are inherently reactive, bottlenecking agents with complex, cross-document reasoning at inference time, while precomputed structures like knowledge graphs often fall short because they rely on rigid he...

Anikait Singh, Teresa Zhang, Yoonho Lee et al. · 0 citations
#artificial intelligence Preprint Oct 2026

Language Is a Security Surface for Agent Guards

This work builds LinguaGuardBench from the 1,220 labelled steps of TS-Bench AgentDojo-Traj, translating only the user instruction into German, French, Turkish, Swahili and Amharic, and keeps every tool call, observation and label byte-identical, so any change in a verdict is attributable to language alone.

Hasan Demirkiran, Jens Ernstberger · 0 citations
#artificial intelligence Preprint Oct 2026

Training-Free On-Policy Distillation

On-policy distillation consolidates specialist models into one student at the price of rollouts, teacher passes and gradient steps for every teacher. We show that the consolidation does not need training: with forward passes only, the capabilities of separately tuned specialists can be aggregated into one model that is...

Bang Yang, Jia-Jun Fan, Zhao-Yu Zhu et al. · 0 citations
#artificial intelligence Preprint Oct 2026

Beyond Downstream QA: Rethinking How We Evaluate Agent Memory

Agent memory benchmarks evaluate whether an agent's responses reflect correct knowledge, measuring downstream question-answering accuracy as a proxy for memory quality. We show this evaluation paradigm is incomplete: it conflates memory correctness with retrieval and generation quality, producing both false positives w...

Sebastian-Antonio Toma, Jean de Kernier, Mike Ply et al. · 0 citations
#artificial intelligence Preprint Open access Oct 2026

Change the Number, Change the Answer: Assessing Rating Scale Sensitivity in LLM-Based Text Scoring

Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly used in computational social science to assign scalar scores to social and psychological constructs. However, studies use different rating scales, and whether their scores remain comparable across scale designs is understudied. To address this gap, we define and systematica...

Wonjeong Jo, Gyuwan Kim, Ming Shan Hee · 0 citations
#artificial intelligence Preprint Open access Oct 2026

Mosaic: Multi-Session Agentic Reinforcement Learning

Most existing agentic reinforcement learning methods assume single-session trajectories, where interaction proceeds within one continuously accumulated context. However, agentic techniques such as context compaction and subagent forking may produce trajectories spanning multiple sessions, creating a mismatch between th...

Yilong Xu, Minrui Xu, Xinyu Zhou et al. · 0 citations
#artificial intelligence Preprint Oct 2026

EMO: A Closed-Loop Test-Time Computation Framework via Alternating Context Optimization and Logits Steering

Test-time context optimization adapts frozen language models through textual feedback, but ordinary conditional generation provides no separate control over how strongly to reinforce the distributional changes induced by a context update. We introduce EMO, a training-free framework inspired by expectation--maximization...

Wei Xia, Ye-Hui Tang, Zhi-Hong Deng · 0 citations
#artificial intelligence Preprint Open access Oct 2026

Explaining the Roles of Experts in Mixture-of-Experts LLMs for Personalization

Personalization of Large Language Models (LLMs) is increasingly important for user-centric applications, yet prior methods mainly adapt dense LLMs, whose polysemantic neurons, each encoding multiple unrelated concepts, hinder localizing the components behind personalization, and thus understanding and controlling it. W...

Sekh Mainul Islam, Pepa Atanasova, Isabelle Augenstein · 0 citations
#artificial intelligence Preprint Oct 2026

Multi-SFT: Permissively-Licensed Multilingual Instruction-Following

Supervised fine-tuning datasets remain overwhelmingly English-centric and commercially restricted, as their content is frequently generated by proprietary models whose terms of service forbid training competing systems. We introduce Multi-SFT, a commercially permissive collection of 502,818 instruction-response pairs a...

Daniela Baiamonte, Kamyar Zeinalipour, Elena Fano et al. · 0 citations
#artificial intelligence Preprint Oct 2026

Momentum, Commentary Tone, and Earnings Surprise in LLM Financial Forecasts

Which inputs drive a language model's financial forecast? We construct synthetic earnings announcements that independently reverse 20-day momentum, non-informational commentary tone, and whether fixed actual EPS beats a manipulated consensus. Six instruction/chat checkpoint conversions from four families (0.49-7.61B ba...

A. Khaybullina · 0 citations
#artificial intelligence Preprint Oct 2026

Selection Is Not Learning: Choosing Model Futures

Self-evolving language models train on tasks they generate, so every round must decide which updated model the next round inherits. Current loops such as R-Zero, Agent0, and Skill Self-Play make this decision through the task, admitting tasks that look learnable and inheriting every resulting update. We identify a sele...

Hao-Yi Yang, Kshitij Mishra, Nils Lukas et al. · 0 citations

From tech blogs

See all →
Microsoft Research Blog Oct 22, 2026

Flint-interactive: A language for creating interactive data visualizations

Flint-interactive gives AI agents a language for creating interactive visualizations. Click a chart, filter data, highlight related content, and explore beyond the view the author originally chose. The post Flint-interactive: A language for creating interactive data visualizations appeared first on Microsoft Research.

MIT News · Artificial Intelligence Oct 15, 2026

AI model decodes the language cells use to communicate

A new computational approach reveals how cells communicate to assemble into tissues. This could accelerate stem cell engineering, improve disease models, and inform therapies.

Microsoft Research Blog Oct 15, 2026

Proof-based general-purpose computing with Magnetar

Zero-knowledge proofs can verify computing results without rerunning workloads or exposing sensitive data. Magnetar helps bring them into the mainstream with support for standard programming languages, major speed gains, and quantum-resistant security. The post Proof-based general-purpose computing with Magnetar appeared first on Microsoft Research.

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.