Sep 2026· International Journal of Ethics and Systems· 0 citations· 50 references
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
TL;DR
AI transparency and bias mitigation are reframed as governance and organizational control mechanisms, rather than mere technical features, which demonstrates that organizational ethical culture acts as a key informal context, shaping whether customers view these mechanisms as credible signals of fairness and accountability.
Abstract
This study aims to examine an unresolved issue in artificial intelligence (AI) driven customer service: Why transparency and bias mitigation do not automatically translate into customer trust across organizational contexts. Specifically, this study investigates the effects of bias mitigation strategies and AI transparency on customer trust, and the moderating role of organizational ethical culture, in the context of China.
A cross-sectional survey of 1,450 customers using generative AI services in banking and e-commerce was conducted. Adapted scales measured perceptions of AI transparency, bias mitigation, customer trust and organizational ethical culture. Data were analyzed using Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling via a two-step approach: assessment of the measurement model (reliability and validity), followed by the structural model to test hypothesized relationships. Multiple regression served as a supplementary robustness check.
The study found that both bias mitigation strategies (β = 0.30, p < 0.001) and AI transparency (β = 0.35, p < 0.001) significantly enhance customer trust. Additionally, organizational ethical culture moderated these effects, amplifying them (β = 0.20 and 0.18, p < 0.01). These results emphasize the importance of transparency and fairness in AI, particularly in organizations with strong ethical cultures.
This study reframes AI transparency and bias mitigation as governance and organizational control mechanisms, rather than mere technical features. It demonstrates that organizational ethical culture acts as a key informal context, shaping whether customers view these mechanisms as credible signals of fairness and accountability. In the Chinese setting, the study explains why transparency and bias mitigation do not automatically build customer trust.
As AI becomes more deeply embedded in scientific workflows, understanding what drives user trust has become central to the sustainable adoption of these tools. This study draws on the Ability-Benevolence-Integrity (ABI) model to examine what shapes trust in AI-powered research tools and how that trust relates to users’...
Mohammad Dalvi-Esfahani, Sharanjit Kaur Bhathal Singh, M. Falahat et al.· Electronic Journal of Busine...· 0 citations
This study aimed to examine the effect of transparency in the use of artificial intelligence in marketing on customer trust, considering the mediating roles of brand authenticity and perceived risk among customers in Tehran. This applied study employed a descriptive-correlational design using structural equation modeli...
Ehsan Peimani· Journal of Technology in Ent...· 0 citations
The findings suggest that trustworthy AI integration requires addressing pre-existing structural failures before introducing algorithmic decision support, and offer design recommendations for AI-supported appraisal systems, with implications for HCI research and organizational practice.
Andreas Harnindito, Akshat Sawarni· Proceedings of the 2026 Euro...· 0 citations
The aim of this paper is to investigate how core characteristics of artificial intelligence (AI), including fairness, accountability and transparency (FAT), contribute to sustainable business value creation.
The data were collected through a survey of 572 respondents who reported AI awareness and workplace e...
This study investigates whether perceived ethicality functions as the psychological mechanism through which AI-enabled banking services strengthen customer loyalty. Rather than relying on conventional demographic segmentation such as religion, ethnicity, or domicile, the study develops a value-oriented explanatory fram...
Hendratmoko· Jurnal Komunikasi dan Bisnis· 0 citations
Introduction Digital platforms increasingly govern users through data collection, inference, sharing, retention, and accountability arrangements, but the psychological consequences of perceived data governance transparency remain underexamined. This study tested whether perceived transparency is associated with platfor...
Shang-Qun Wu, Mei-Qi Yin· Frontiers in Psychology· 0 citations
Related blog posts
MIT News · Artificial Intelligence· news.mit.eduSep 30, 2026
With $2.1 million funding from Google.org, the open-source Public Transit Intelligence Hub will unify public transit monitoring, operations, and passenger communication.