Skip to content

AI Literacy: An Exercise in Power-Knowledge

Jul 2026 · arXiv.org · Vol abs/2607.27547 · 0 citations
Computer Science

TL;DR

This paper argues that the existing frameworks for AI literacy are insufficient because they enforce a consumer-orientation toward AI rather than fostering genuine epistemic agency, and proposes a three-part framework of AI literacy based on the notions of contextual use, critical interrogation, and participatory governance.

Abstract

As generative artificial intelligence becomes one of the most significant systems of knowledge production in our society today, questions relating to who can access and shape that production grow increasingly important in our discourse. This paper argues that the existing frameworks for AI literacy, which are dominated by technical competency and responsible-use principles, are insufficient because they enforce a"consumer"orientation toward AI rather than fostering genuine epistemic agency. Based upon Foucault's concept of power-knowledge, Freire's pedagogy of critical consciousness, and scholarship of digital literacy, this paper proposes a reconceptualization of AI literacy as a critical practice that equips individuals not just to use AI systems, but to critically evaluate them, resist their structuring assumptions, and participate in their governance. The paper further argues that unequal access to AI tools in society recapitulates longstanding epistemic injustices, and that a literacy framework oriented toward empowerment must account for these structural inequities. A three-part framework of AI literacy based on the notions of contextual use, critical interrogation, and participatory governance frames this literacy as a cultivation of epistemic"agents"rather than the training of competent consumers of AI-generated information.

View source

Similar papers

Open access Jul 2026

Engineering Education at the Intersection of Knowledge, Work, and Power: Generative AI and Epistemic Authority

Generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) is rapidly reshaping engineering education, yet prevailing debates frame its impact narrowly as either pedagogical innovation or epistemic threat. In this article, we argue that such framings misdiagnose the problem by treating GenAI as a tool rather than as a sociotechnical...

Mehmet Aydeniz · 1 citation
Aug 2026

AI literacy as an extension of digital literacy: A conceptual framework for knowledge work in AI-enabled organizations

This study develops a conceptual framework that positions AI literacy as an extension of digital literacy within contemporary knowledge work environments and proposes a theoretical framework explaining how human capabilities interact with intelligent technologies to support knowledge creation, decision-making, and orga...

Kha Huy Tran · 0 citations
Review Open access Jul 2026

Understanding the Machine Part I: A Practical Framework for AI Ethics in Higher Education

A research-based approach to make the abstract concrete, metaphorically speaking, by putting the concepts into a wheelbarrow so the authors can push them around more successfully in the context of the higher education institutional and classroom settings.

Janet L Hanson · 0 citations
Review Open access Nov 2024

Generative AI and Agency in Education: A Critical Scoping Review and Thematic Analysis

The findings suggest that while GenAI may enhance learner agency through personalisation and support, it also risks exacerbating educational inequalities and diminishing learner autonomy in certain contexts.

Jasper Roe, Mike Perkins · 23 citations
Conference Open access Aug 2026

From Information Literacy to AI Literacy: A New Pedagogical Role for Academic Libraries

This paper conceptualizes AI literacy as an extension rather than a replacement of information literacy and argues that academic libraries are uniquely positioned to mediate this transition due to their longstanding expertise in critical inquiry, ethical information use, and learner-centered pedagogy.

V. Mammadova · 0 citations
Preprint Aug 2026

Reclaiming Epistemic Agency: A Critical Framework for Human-Generative AI Co-Agency in Education

A conceptual evaluation of the extent to which GenAI redistributes students' and teachers'ability to act in classrooms to produce knowledge, validate each other's claims, and create evidence of student learning while collaborating with and competing against humans is presented.

Biranchi Poudyal · 0 citations

Related blog posts

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.