This paper argues that the existing frameworks for AI literacy are insufficient because they enforce a consumer-orientation toward AI rather than fostering genuine epistemic agency, and proposes a three-part framework of AI literacy based on the notions of contextual use, critical interrogation, and participatory governance.
Abstract
As generative artificial intelligence becomes one of the most significant systems of knowledge production in our society today, questions relating to who can access and shape that production grow increasingly important in our discourse. This paper argues that the existing frameworks for AI literacy, which are dominated by technical competency and responsible-use principles, are insufficient because they enforce a"consumer"orientation toward AI rather than fostering genuine epistemic agency. Based upon Foucault's concept of power-knowledge, Freire's pedagogy of critical consciousness, and scholarship of digital literacy, this paper proposes a reconceptualization of AI literacy as a critical practice that equips individuals not just to use AI systems, but to critically evaluate them, resist their structuring assumptions, and participate in their governance. The paper further argues that unequal access to AI tools in society recapitulates longstanding epistemic injustices, and that a literacy framework oriented toward empowerment must account for these structural inequities. A three-part framework of AI literacy based on the notions of contextual use, critical interrogation, and participatory governance frames this literacy as a cultivation of epistemic"agents"rather than the training of competent consumers of AI-generated information.
Generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) is rapidly reshaping engineering education, yet prevailing debates frame its impact narrowly as either pedagogical innovation or epistemic threat. In this article, we argue that such framings misdiagnose the problem by treating GenAI as a tool rather than as a sociotechnical...
This study develops a conceptual framework that positions AI literacy as an extension of digital literacy within contemporary knowledge work environments and proposes a theoretical framework explaining how human capabilities interact with intelligent technologies to support knowledge creation, decision-making, and orga...
Kha Huy Tran· Business Information Review· 0 citations
A research-based approach to make the abstract concrete, metaphorically speaking, by putting the concepts into a wheelbarrow so the authors can push them around more successfully in the context of the higher education institutional and classroom settings.
Janet L Hanson· International Journal of Lea...· 0 citations
The findings suggest that while GenAI may enhance learner agency through personalisation and support, it also risks exacerbating educational inequalities and diminishing learner autonomy in certain contexts.
Jasper Roe, Mike Perkins· Academia AI and Applications· 23 citations
This paper conceptualizes AI literacy as an extension rather than a replacement of information literacy and argues that academic libraries are uniquely positioned to mediate this transition due to their longstanding expertise in critical inquiry, ethical information use, and learner-centered pedagogy.
V. Mammadova· Proceedings of the Internati...· 0 citations
A conceptual evaluation of the extent to which GenAI redistributes students' and teachers'ability to act in classrooms to produce knowledge, validate each other's claims, and create evidence of student learning while collaborating with and competing against humans is presented.
Biranchi Poudyal· 0 citations
Related blog posts
MIT News · Artificial Intelligence· news.mit.eduSep 30, 2026
With $2.1 million funding from Google.org, the open-source Public Transit Intelligence Hub will unify public transit monitoring, operations, and passenger communication.