Skip to content
Open access

Ethical Decision-Making in the Workplace: Which Factors Influence Decision-Makers' Willingness to Revise Their Decisions due to AI-Generated Suggestions?

Jul 2026 · Human Factors · pp. 187208261461812 · 0 citations · 88 references
Medicine

TL;DR

Human factors play a more prominent role than AI certifications when it comes to trust-building in AI suggestions for ethical decision-making in the workplace, suggesting that overall, AI attitude may overshadow perceived certifier trustworthiness.

Abstract

ObjectiveTo examine how moral intensity and perceived trustworthiness of an AI certifier influence individuals' willingness to change their decision due to AI-generated suggestions.BackgroundAI-supported decision-making is increasingly used in professional contexts and situations with a high moral intensity. Yet it is unclear how different factors influence the willingness to base decisions on AI-generated suggestions in such situations. Perceived trustworthiness in the AI system is key for effective and ethically sound deployment. Investigating the interplay of these factors is critical for understanding AI-supported ethical decision-making and designing AI systems that support responsible decision-making in morally complex workplace environments.MethodWe conducted a 2 × 2 vignette-based online experiment with a representative US sample (n = 546), manipulating moral intensity and AI certifier trustworthiness. Participants made an initial workplace decision (whom to let go), received a deviating AI suggestion, and then made a second decision. Effects of independent and control variables on decision changes were analyzed using hierarchical logistic regression and χ2-tests.ResultsDecision makers were more likely to change decisions in high moral intensity scenarios due to AI suggestions. Certifier trustworthiness had no significant effect, whereas a positive general attitude towards AI increased the likelihood of changing decisions, suggesting that overall, AI attitude may overshadow perceived certifier trustworthiness.ConclusionHuman factors play a more prominent role than AI certifications when it comes to trust-building in AI suggestions for ethical decision-making in the workplace. Further research is needed to clarify how these factors interact with perceived certifier trustworthiness and other contextual factors.ApplicationEncouraging reliance on AI-based recommendations via certifications alone is challenging. Organizations should focus on their employees' general attitudes towards AI to support AI-based ethical decision-making in the workplace. AI systems could play a significant supporting role particularly in decision situations with high moral intensity.

Read PDF

Similar papers

Review Open access Jul 2026

AI Trustworthness in Managerial Decision-Making: Ethics, Transparency, and Explainability as Key Drivers

The findings suggest that perceived AI trustworthiness is positively associated with responsible AI adoption and higher perceived decision efficacy, while decision complexity is an important boundary condition associated with the perceived efficacy of GAI in managerial decision processes.

Guangming Cao, Yanqing Duan, John S. Edwards · 0 citations
Review Aug 2026

The ethical dilemmas of AI-driven leadership: analyzing the shift from emotion-based decision-making to data-driven choices

This study advances AI leadership ethics by demonstrating that emotional sensitivity moderates the relationship between AI-supported decisions and ethical outcomes, and provides a context-sensitive framework that clarifies when AI can be used ethically and when human empathy is indispensable.

Abid Hussain, M. Ehsan, Jing Song · 0 citations
Review Open access Sep 2026

"We Know What We Don't Know" A Reflexive Synthesis of Research and Lay Knowledge Regarding Group Decision-Making in Mountaineering.

Groups navigating dynamic and hazardous mountain environments must continuously engage in collective decision-making. However, the assumption that groups naturally make better decisions than individuals is misleading. Groupthink, group polarisation, and other social dynamics can impair judgement and lead to sub-optimal...

Anna E. Bergauer, Svenja A. Wolf, A. Schittenhelm et al. · 0 citations
Review Open access 2018

Ethical Implications of AI-Driven Decision Making in Society

It is suggested in the paper that a methodology of ethical governance based on principles of responsible AI should be structured, fairness-by-design, transparency, human-in-the-loop oversight, and constant impact assessment, which underscores the fact that AI systems have ethical failures that are seldom technical but...

Fatou Diop · 0 citations
Open access Aug 2026

Building trust and reducing perceived complexity in AI adoption: effects on decision-making quality in maritime organisations

The results indicate that AI system quality, AI system transparency and AI familiarity significantly enhance AI trust, while AI beliefs have a non-significant effect, and suggest that trust is the main mechanism through which AI-related social and technical factors contribute to improved decision-making outcomes.

Zhaotong Li, Ting-Ong Yan, K. Yuen · 0 citations

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.