This paper advocates for a humanistic transformation of business education, drawing on three converging scholarly traditions: the capabilities approach (Sen 1999; Nussbaum 2011), the humanistic management tradition (Melé 2003; Pirson 2017; Dierksmeier 2019), and Pope Francis’s vision of integral ecology (
Laudato Si’
, LS 137–139). It offers a philosophical and pedagogical critique of the technocratic paradigm that dominates sustainability discourse in business schools — a paradigm that Critical Management Studies (Alvesson & Willmott 1992; Spicer & Alvesson 2025) has shown to be structurally resistant to transformation, operating through the slow formation of identity and desire rather than through explicit instruction alone. Through a normative lens, the paper re-centers practical reason, affiliation, and moral imagination as the foundations of transformative leadership formation. It argues that genuine reform is obstructed by structural barriers — accreditation pressures, ranking systems, and market forces — that systematically incentivize instrumental over ethical formation. At the same time, it identifies emerging alternatives in business education that point toward viable pedagogical reform. In response to both this diagnosis and these possibilities, it proposes principles for an education capable of forming leaders with the practical wisdom, relational depth, and moral imagination that a crisis-ridden world demands.
Business schools are frequently presented as meritocratic institutions that reward talent, effort and entrepreneurial capability. This article examines how business education can simultaneously acknowledge inequality rhetorically while continuing to legitimize unequal outcomes pedagogically. Drawing genealogically on...
David Roberts· British Journal of Managemen...· 0 citations
This paper challenges the dominant utilitarian paradigm of innovation, which reduces technology development to measures of patentability, profitability, and efficiency. Drawing on influential figures in the field of technology philosophy, including Heidegger, Ellul, Feenberg, Ihde, and Stiegler, it makes the case that...
This paper examines how quality culture has been discursively constructed in higher education scholarship and policy, and develops an alternative conceptualization grounded in academic values rather than governance imperatives. Quality culture has become a central reference point in higher education, frequently posit...
Balqees Rashid Suleiman al Mandhari· The Hungarian Educational Re...· 0 citations
This paper aims to examine how the notion of the common good has evolved within the social sciences, with a particular focus on its application in business ethics and corporate social responsibility. Although scholars often cite the concept, they frequently use it ambiguously or without critical reflection. This st...
J. Belso-Martínez, M. López-Sánchez, Alicia Mas-Tur et al.· International Journal of Eth...· 0 citations
This study examined the linguistic signature of entrepreneurship education and how it differs from instruction in other disciplines. Applying
Bernstein’s (1975)
concepts of visible pedagogy (the explicit transmission of knowledge) and invisible pedagogy (the implicit modeling of a disposition through discourse), th...
T. Stillman· Entrepreneurship Education a...· 0 citations
Universities today face accelerating instability, shaped by audit cultures, performance metrics, and constant pressures for adaptation. Leadership is often framed in managerial terms of strategic control and technical problem‐solving, yet such models risk obscuring the ethical responsibility that sustains instituti...
Linnéa K. Jermstad· Educational Theory· 0 citations
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.