Skip to content
Review Open access

From Companion to Mediator

Jul 2026 · The International Journal of Design Management and Professional Practice · 0 citations

TL;DR

This review argues for expanding the social role of AI from that of a companion to that of a catalytic mediator so that AI can support more diverse H–H social relationships.

Abstract

While artificial intelligence (AI) is increasingly being adopted to mitigate social isolation, existing research has predominantly examined human–AI (H–AI) companionship, potentially overlooking the risk that AI agents are being used as a substitute for authentic human-to-human (H–H) social connections. This scoping review investigates the relatively underexplored domain of AI as a catalytic mediator designed to promote H–H social connections. Guided by PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta‑Analyses) and study selection process, a total of 225 studies published between January 2021 and October 2025 were initially retrieved, of which five were ultimately selected for analysis. By examining empirical studies on AI-mediated H–H social connections, this study explores the current state of research, identifies design implications, and then develops preliminary design guidelines for enhancing the quality of H–H social connections. The findings reveal that the reviewed studies frequently exhibit structural limitations, such as a reliance on dyadic relationships, insufficient reciprocal support mechanisms for vulnerable populations, and a lack of exit strategies. Ultimately, this review argues for expanding the social role of AI from that of a companion to that of a catalytic mediator so that AI can support more diverse H–H social relationships.

Read PDF

Similar papers

The perceived whiteness of artificial intelligence.

The findings show that AI is not perceived as socially neutral but instead acquires racial meanings associated with credibility, authority, and capability, demonstrating how social categories shape perceptions of novel technological entities beyond their underlying algorithmic properties.

M. Gamez-Djokic, Adam Waytz · 0 citations
Review Open access Aug 2026

Artificial Intelligence in eWOM: Roles, Mechanisms, and an Integrative Framework

An AI-enabled lifecycle of Creation, Transformation, Transmission, Evaluation, Evaluation, and Governance is proposed and an AI-eWOM fit perspective is developed and a TCCM-organized research agenda identifies priorities for future research.

A. Joyal · 0 citations
Review Open access Aug 2026

GENERATIVE ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE IN HUMAN–AI COMMUNICATION: A SYSTEMATIC LITERATURE REVIEW AND FUTURE RESEARCH AGENDA

This study proposes a Four-Dimensional Integrative Conceptual Framework (Ontological-Agency, Psycho-Social, Epistemic-Democratic, and Governance-Ethical) and confirms five analytical propositions, including the "Generative Paradox" and the "Dual Attributional Mechanism" regarding anthropomorphism.

J. Raharjo, Vanessa Alpha Z.D.R · 0 citations
Open access Jul 2026

“When artificial intelligence (AI) meets perfectionism”: examining how responsible AI influences knowledge exchanges

It is demonstrated that ethical AI encourages knowledge sharing most effectively when synchronized with a supportive, rather than perfectionistic, work culture, and that ethical AI encourages knowledge sharing most effectively when synchronized with a supportive, rather than perfectionistic, work culture.

Byung-Jik Kim, Yeon-Jun Choi, Julak Lee · 0 citations
Open access Sep 2026

Artificial Intelligence (AI) Can't Feel Me: Lower Perceived AI Perspective–Taking Impedes Human–AI Cooperation

It is found that individuals are generally reluctant to cooperate with AI possessing partial decision‐making authority, and this reluctance is shaped by perceived AI perspective‐taking, and it is suggested that psychologically anthropomorphic design may foster more effective human–AI interaction.

Xu-Yao Wu, Ye Li, Rui-Ning Wang et al. · 0 citations
Review Sep 2026

How AI amplifies, mitigates, and creates social biases: A tripartite framework.

This review synthesizes recent empirical literature within a tripartite framework organized around the core pathways along which AI shapes social biases: AI design, lay beliefs about how AI operates, and processes of social evaluation and attribution.

Phyliss Jia Gai · 0 citations

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.