The results demonstrate that structure-guided refinement of AI-designed deaminases can produce precise, versatile base editors for nuclear and mitochondrial genomes, expanding the research and therapeutic applications of genome editing toolkits.
Abstract
Abstract Traditional adenine base editors (ABEs), primarily derived from TadA, suffer from bystander editing and limited diversity, while artificial intelligence (AI)-designed deaminases such as Deam-P32 exhibit lower efficiency and precision than state-of-the-art editors such as ABE8e. Here, we report the OpenABE variants through the structure-guided evolution of Deam-P32 by optimizing DNA engagement and the base-contacting pocket and incorporating C-terminal extensions from ABE8e. These variants achieved a 16–36-fold increase in A-to-G conversion efficiency over Deam-P32, matching the editing efficiency of ABE8e across 29 endogenous nuclear loci while mitigating bystander cytosine editing. OpenABEs also reduced ATC motif bystander editing and produced fewer guide RNA-independent off-target effects on DNA and RNA. Further, we adapted these variants to mitochondrial DNA editing by designing OpenABE-TALEDs, which yielded editing efficiencies comparable or superior to those of ABE8e-TALEDs. Delivery through engineered virus-like particles further enhanced specificity and product purity. These results demonstrate that structure-guided refinement of AI-designed deaminases can produce precise, versatile base editors for nuclear and mitochondrial genomes, expanding the research and therapeutic applications of genome editing toolkits.
Base editors (BEs) enable efficient A-to-G or C-to-T conversions without double-stranded DNA cleavage, but their editing windows remain difficult to tune, limiting genome engineering flexibility. Here, we engineered CRISPR/Cas12b sgRNA by introducing MS2 hairpins to recruit an MS2-N55K-cytidine deaminase-UGI complex, e...
This review compares Cas9-mediated homology-directed repair (HDR) with generations of cytosine base editors (CBE1–CBE3), adenine base editors (ABE1-ABE7), and prime editors (PE1–PE3b), focusing on their mechanistic distinctions, efficiencies, delivery challenges, and therapeutic applications.
Anoushka Sinha· American Journal of Student...· 0 citations
This review focuses on the action mode of different base editors, highlights their interplays with the TLS, summarizes their potential therapeutic applications and discusses perspective strategies to improve precision and expand targeting scope.
R. Tao, Min Li, Tong-Yun Luo et al.· Biotechnology Advances· 0 citations
The engineered tBE (etBE) exhibited substantially enhanced editing efficiencies compared with the parental tBE, while maintaining high editing fidelity and background levels of OT mutations, and represents a highly efficient and specific base editing platform with enormous potential for both basic research and clinical...
Bo-Wen Chen, Le-Tong Liang, Ruijuan Xu et al.· Advancement of science· 0 citations
An efficient Cas9d system (Cas9dUltra) is developed through gRNA and protein engineering, and its base editors (9dBEs) further developed through gRNA and protein engineering, enabling efficient and precise genome editing in human cells.
Qingquan Xiao, Zhijin Tian, Luqi Weng et al.· Advancement of science· 0 citations
Findings establish gRNA length as an additional parameter for tuning nucleotide level base editing outcomes and reducing bystander editing as a strategy to modulate base editing outcomes.