Aug 2026· IAES International Journal of Artificial Intelligence (IJ-AI)· Vol 15, pp. 3009· 0 citations· 70 references
TL;DR
The study posits a novel interpretive framework for addressing the ontological problem of AI, one that implicates future legal, moral, and interactive structures surrounding conscious non-biological agents surrounding conscious non-biological agents.
Abstract
The question of whether artificial intelligence (AI) systems can attain consciousness remains central ontological challenge within interdisciplinary discourse spanning AI, philosophy of mind, and cognitive neuroscience. This study investigates the metaphysical status of AI systems by interrogating the explanatory clarity of their existence and the potential emergence of subjectivity from non-biological matter. Employing an integrative methodology that combines a comprehensive literature review of scholarly texts and recent empirical findings with philosophical critical analysis, the research explores the conditions under which AI systems might be considered conscious entities. Findings suggest that the expanding societal integration of AI necessitates a re-evaluation of consciousness and cognition beyond anthropocentric parameters. The study posits a novel interpretive framework for addressing the ontological problem of AI, one that implicates future legal, moral, and interactive structures surrounding conscious non-biological agents. This conceptual repositioning invites a deeper inquiry into the criteria for recognizing, engaging with, and regulating advanced AI systems. By grounding design principles in ontological clarity, the framework offers guidance for constructing AI systems capable of reflexive processing, minimal phenomenality, and ethically aligned behavior that bridges conceptual analysis with implementation pathways.
It is found that AI is no lointelligenceew technology but active overwriting of the cognitive and psychocultural context in which people encounter new data modalities through new "intelligences".
G. R. N. Gunarathne· International Journal of Lat...· 0 citations
This article develops “pseudo-consciousness” as an analytical category for advanced artificial intelligence systems whose organized performance of consciousness-associated functions reshapes how they are interpreted, trusted, and governed without thereby justifying a positive attribution of phenomenal subjectivity. The...
José Augusto de Lima Prestes· AI and Ethics· 0 citations
The concept of “alienated intelligence” is introduced to critically examine contemporary cultural perceptions of artificial intelligence to argue that certain visions of AI function as cultural projections of human cognitive capacities that become externalized, idealized, and reified in technological systems.
This paper consists of two interconnected parts, both challenging mainstream computational views of mind and intelligence. In the first part, the author argues for a fundamental reconceptualization of cognition. He contends that the success of neural network-based AI and the universal properties of human language expos...
John-Michael M. Kuczynski· Communication & Cognitio...· 0 citations
Abstract Generative artificial intelligence has intensified longstanding philosophical questions concerning human cognition and epistemic autonomy. This paper argues that generative AI does not make human beings smarter as such; its epistemic significance depends on how human–AI interaction is structured and normativel...
This paper introduces the concept of informational self-meaning (ISM) as a philosophical account for addressing AI ontology and epistemology. Unlike theories such as Higher-Order Thought (HOT), Integrated Information Theory (IIT), and Global Workspace Theory (GWT), which encounter regress, reductionism, or anthropocent...