Skip to content

Machine Learning Models for Software Cost Estimation

Jul 2026 · International Scientific Journal of Engineering and Management · Vol 05, pp. 1-9 · 0 citations

TL;DR

Results show that machine learning methods can be used to predict software cost with a high accuracy rate, and demonstrate that ensemble and neural network-based models generally outperform traditional statistical methods in terms of prediction accuracy and adaptability to non-linear relationships within project data.

Abstract

Abstract Software cost estimation is a critical task in software projects development. It assists project managers and software engineers to plan and manage their resources. However, developing an accurate cost estimation model for a software project is a challenging process. This paper builds a software cost estimation model using machine learning approach. Different machine learning algorithms are applied to two public datasets to predict the software cost in the early stages. Results show that machine learning methods can be used to predict software cost with a high accuracy rate. Accurate software cost estimation remains one of the most critical challenges in software project management, directly influencing budgeting, resource allocation, scheduling, and overall project success. Traditional estimation techniques—such as expert judgment, algorithmic models (e.g., COCOMO), and function point analysis—often struggle with the increasing complexity, scale, and variability of modern software projects, leading to inaccurate predictions and cost overruns. This project explores the application of machine learning (ML) models to improve the accuracy and reliability of software cost estimation. Various ML techniques, including Linear Regression, Decision Trees, Random Forests, Support Vector Machines (SVM), and Artificial Neural Networks (ANN), are investigated and compared using historical software project datasets (such as COCOMO, Desharnais, or NASA datasets). Key project attributes—such as lines of code, function points, team experience, development environment, and project complexity—are used as input features to predict effort and cost outcomes. Data preprocessing techniques, including normalization, feature selection, and handling of missing values, are applied to enhance model performance. The performance of each model is evaluated using metrics such as Mean Magnitude of Relative Error (MMRE), Root Mean Square Error (RMSE), and Prediction Accuracy (PRED), enabling a comparative analysis to identify the most effective approach. Experimental results demonstrate that ensemble and neural network-based models generally outperform traditional statistical methods in terms of prediction accuracy and adaptability to non-linear relationships within project data. This project highlights the potential of machine learning as a robust, data-driven alternative to conventional cost estimation methods, offering improved decision-making support for project managers and stakeholders. Future work may focus on integrating deep learning architectures, real-time data streams, and hybrid models to further enhance estimation precision across diverse software development environments. Keywords: Software Cost Estimation, Machine Learning, Effort Prediction, COCOMO Model, Regression Analysis, Neural Networks, Random Forest, Support Vector Machine, Predictive Modeling, Software Project Management, Data Preprocessing, Feature Selection

View source

Similar papers

Review

Evaluation of Software Effort Estimation Methods for Machine learning techniques

A review of deferent machine learning methods that are using for effort estimation like regression models, decision trees, random forest, neural networks, and then evaluate this models based on performance criteria such as MAE (Mean Absolute Error) and R 2 Score.

Montaser Fadulalla Ahmed Adam, Haroun Abdalla Eissa · 0 citations
Review Open access Jul 2026

Artificial Intelligence Techniques to Enhance Cost, Effort, and Schedule Estimates in Software Development Projects: A Systematic Literature Review

The findings indicate that techniques such as artificial neural networks, optimization algorithms, machine learning models, and hybrid approaches consistently yield improvements in estimation accuracy, with average error reductions reported in the literature ranging approximately from 15% to 30% when compared with trad...

Rodolfo Barbosa Santos, L. E. G. Martins · 0 citations
Open access Aug 2026

A Robust Heterogeneous Ensemble Framework for Software Cost Estimation with Prediction Uncertainty Quantification

This paper presents a method using an uncertainty-aware heterogeneous ensemble of 100 bootstrap-trained base learners, which jointly produce point predictions and prediction intervals using a robust trimmed mean, with effort modeled on the log scale.

H. Sharif, Tara Nawzad Ahmad Al Attar, D. Rashid · 0 citations
Open access 2021

Predicting Software Maintainability Using AI Models

Experiments demonstrate the effectiveness of AI-based predictions in improving software quality assessment, providing actionable insights, and supporting proactive maintenance strategies in improving software quality assessment and reducing maintenance effort.

Fatima Noor · 0 citations
Aug 2026

Agile Software Cost Estimation Model Based on Constricted Particle Swarm Optimization

The results indicate that CPSO can effectively tune the Agile cost estimation model within the specific dataset and experimental setting considered in this study, and provide parameter‐level insights that may support future calibration of agile cost estimation models on larger and more heterogeneous datasets.

Xu-Wei Guo, Z. Mansor, Xiaoyan Zhao et al. · 0 citations
Review Open access Jul 2026

Application of Machine Learning in Predicting Project Cost Overruns: A Review

Machine Learning has great potential in supporting early warning systems and data-driven decision-making to control the risk of project cost overruns and is concluded to produce higher levels of accuracy than traditional statistical methods or single ML models.

J. Anggawan, Agustinus Purna Irawan, M. Waty · 0 citations

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.