Skip to content

Exploring Design Principles for Generative AI-Supported Reading Education: An Illustrative Lesson Design

Jul 2026 · The Journal of Future and Convergence Education · Vol 4, pp. 29-58 · 0 citations

TL;DR

This study is significant in that it specified the core of GAI-based reading education not as the introduction of AI functions but as the design of boundaries between AI support and learners’ direct performance.

Abstract

This study aims to analyze recurring design issues in reading education using Generative Artificial Intelligence (GAI) and to structure them into design principles applicable to reading instruction. To this end, 47 core studies were analyzed, and meaning units, initial codes, subcategories, and provisional upper categories were derived. Subsequently, a first-round independent rating and a second-round re-rating were conducted with six experts in reading education, Korean language education, AI literacy, AI ethics, educational technology, and educational evaluation. In the second-round re-rating, all 40 items showed an I-CVI of .83 or higher, and the S-CVI/Ave was .96. As a result, five design principles for GAI-based reading education were derived: learning support and performance efficiency (Efficiency type), creative expansion of reading experience (Augmentation type), critical verification of AI-generated output (Critique type), protection of learner-directed reading (Detachment type), and adaptive learning support (Personalization type). These principles were also explained as being combined through adaptive regulation, a complementary pathway, auxiliary interactions, and tension– balance relationships. Based on these findings, a one-period instructional design example was presented for argumentative text reading in the second year of middle school. This study is significant in that it specified the core of GAI-based reading education not as the introduction of AI functions but as the design of boundaries between AI support and learners’ direct performance.

View source

Similar papers

Review

Design Principles for Generative AI Literacy Development in Design Principles for Generative AI Literacy Development in Teaching Teaching

A Design Science Research approach is adopted and multiple GenAI-based interventions at a French business school are implemented, indicating increased student awareness and confidence in critically using GenAI and six actionable design principles are derived to support the meaningful integration of GenAI into higher ed...

Sarah Hönigsberg, Laura Watkowski, Sabrine Mallek et al. · 0 citations
Open access Aug 2026

Leveraging Generative AI To Foster Teachers’ Creativity in Lesson Design

The results suggested that GenAI improved teachers’ originality, multimodal lesson design, and learner-centered instructional practices, however, participants were worried about authenticity and overreliance on AI as well.

Thanh Loan Vu, Minh Tri Nguyen · 0 citations
Review Open access Sep 2026

Artificial Intelligence in Practice-Based and Creative Learning Pedagogies in Higher Education: A Systematic Review of Instructional Designs and Learning Outcomes

The evidence supports a cautious conclusion: AI commonly expands ideation, visualization, feedback, and workflow options, while stronger claims about improved creativity or learning depend on controlled designs, objective/artefact-based assessment, and longer-term evidence.

Jin-Jin Zhu, Vimala Govindasamy · 0 citations

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.