Beginning in childhood, and continuing throughout our lives, we are immersed in a web of attitudes, evaluations, and practices that are evidence of our deep commitment to moral responsibility. At the same time, we encounter puzzles and perplexities that may encourage a misplaced scepticism about moral responsibility. This Very Short Introduction explores our understanding of moral responsibility and what it involves. Among the various difficulties that we must confront are issues of retribution and punishment, moral education and manipulation, and how to identify and respond to those whose moral competence is impaired or in doubt. The account provided defends an understanding of moral responsibility that begins with a realistic moral psychology and that acknowledges the limits to agential control. No adequate interpretation of moral responsibility can require that the trajectory of our ethical lives is entirely immune to fate and luck. To insist on an ‘idealism’ of this kind would be to invite an implausible and unlivable scepticism about the foundations of moral responsibility. The ‘realist’ alternative offers a more truthful, effective, and humane way of addressing these issues. The picture presented is one that falls in the territory that lies between a consoling optimism and a bleak pessimism about our human ethical predicament.
What can we learn from the fundamental nature of the universe? And how might such learning shape our understanding of the human self and our ethical responsibilities in a rapidly developing world? This article brings into conversation three domains that are often treated separately: contemporary cosmology, philosophica...
Chris Jones· Journal of Interdisciplinary...· 0 citations
A morality of recognition maintains that moral norms have their authority in virtue of the ways in which those norms enact an ideal moral relationship. T. M. Scanlon argues that this approach can yield an account of the distinctive force of morality and an attractive account of moral motivation. We find this approach...
Barry Maguire, Oded Na'aman· Philosophy and Phenomenologi...· 0 citations
In determining the moral responsibility of an action, one may need to consider the possible conditions behind the action. Intuitively, an agent is morally responsible for an outcome only if an agent caused that outcome. However, there are possible conditions that can reject this perspective. Oscar Wilde’s The Picture o...
Wisnu Aji Prasetyo· Rainbow: Journal of Literatu...· 0 citations
Buddhist ethics makes the connection between philosophical analysis and moral cultivation: How does suffering come about and how can it come to an end? This article looks at a concentrated issue in this tradition, namely, the maintenance of moral responsibility, in the face of Buddha's doctrine of no permanent self. It...
Ven Godamune Chullanaga Thero· Sri Lanka Journal of Buddhis...· 0 citations
Human freedom and moral responsibility have been among the most controversial in modern philosophy due to their implications in metaphysics, ethics, moral psychology, law, neuroscience and social theory. The question was debated in traditional terms as a struggle between free will and determinism: When all actions are...
Ismat Ara· British Journal of Arts and...· 0 citations