While both groups demonstrate a broadly positive orientation toward AI, students approach AI primarily as an efficiency-driven learning tool, whereas academic staff emphasize pedagogical control, ethical considerations, and responsible use, exposing a critical gap between rapid AI adoption and insufficient pedagogical integration.
Abstract
Rapidly expanding use of Generative Artificial Intelligence (GenAI) in higher education creates both opportunities and challenges for learning assessment. While GenAI can provide adaptive feedback and personalization, its pedagogical integration remains underdeveloped and often disconnected from established theories of learning and participatory design processes. This paper addresses this gap by proposing an integrative conceptual model of Hybrid Intelligent Assessment Systems (HIAS), which combines AI capabilities with human oversight to enable transparent, ethical, and pedagogically aligned assessment. HIAS is structured through three interdependent layers of adoption: a pedagogical layer, aligning AI-supported assessment with self-regulated learning and the development of knowledge, skills, and attitudes; a governance layer, ensuring transparency, fairness, and human-in-the-loop validation; and a technological layer, enabling scalable integration within digital learning environments. The study is situated in Estonia, a digitally advanced context with system-level AI integration through the national AI Leap initiative. To complement the conceptual model, an empirical study was conducted across three major Estonian universities, involving 66 professors and researchers and 153 students. In addition, a small-scale pilot implementation was conducted in a design thinking course to explore the practical feasibility of a course-specific HIAS-based AI assistant. The findings reveal a consistent pattern: while both groups demonstrate a broadly positive orientation toward AI, students approach AI primarily as an efficiency-driven learning tool, whereas academic staff emphasize pedagogical control, ethical considerations, and responsible use. Across both groups, AI literacy remains uneven, particularly in critical evaluation and structured application. These findings expose a critical gap between rapid AI adoption and insufficient pedagogical integration. In response, HIAS is proposed as a structured, human-centered framework that supports teachers in designing AI-enhanced learning environments and students in developing critical, self-regulated, and responsible use of AI.
This study proposes an Integrated Human and Digital Communication (IHDC) model that conceptualizes translation learning as a communicative and cognitive process shaped by dynamic interactions between human agents and AI systems. Drawing on the Transactional Model of Human Communication, the Community of Inquiry framewo...
This paper proposes CARE-AI, a holistic conceptual framework for the responsible integration of artificial intelligence (AI) in primary education. The framework addresses a key gap in existing AI in Education (AIED) literature by integrating pedagogical alignment, adaptive learning, ethical governance and teacher a...
The review indicates that AI can support personalized and adaptive learning, virtual laboratories, scientific inquiry, immediate feedback, intelligent assessment, and teacher decision-making, but effective integration is constrained by inadequate digital infrastructure, limited teacher preparedness and AI literacy, dat...
O. O., Dike Obiageri Ijioma, Okanume Chioma M. et al.· International journal of re...· 0 citations
A systematic review of peer-reviewed studies published between 2015 and 2024 concludes that while tools such as generative artificial intelligence, intelligent tutoring systems, virtual and augmented reality, and predictive analytics are increasingly present, their adoption is concentrated in specific areas, particular...
Firas Almasri· International journal of tec...· 0 citations
By isolating the crucial components of fairness, accountability, and agency which underpin the factors most predictive of teacher readiness, this study lays a framework for leaders and policy makers searching to translate teacher doubt into enthusiastic and responsible carrying out of AI tools.
L. Ajaka· Journal of Intelligent Decis...· 0 citations
It is argued that there is a need to use licensed GenAI solutions, to train educators, to redesign assessment processes, and also to develop an appropriate governance framework.
Dolantina Hyka, Elion Shabanaj, Jurgen Meçaj et al.· International Journal of Adv...· 0 citations
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.