A unified view is provided of how genome structure is established, how it relates to function, and how its disruption contributes to tumorigenesis, suggesting that alterations in genome structure can, in some contexts, actively reshape oncogenic programs.
Abstract
The three-dimensional (3D) genome provides an essential layer of organization that shapes genome function in space and time. Chromatin compartments and topologically associating domains (TADs) arise from the interplay between intrinsic properties of chromatin and architectural factors, including cohesin and CTCF. Despite substantial progress in defining these structural features, whether 3D genome architecture plays a causal role in regulating processes such as transcription, DNA replication, and DNA repair, or instead reflects underlying regulatory activity, remains unresolved. Here, we use the distinction between chromatin-intrinsic features and architectural factors as a framework to evaluate evidence for causality in genome structure-function relationships. We extend this framework to cancer, where both intrinsic alterations (including noncoding mutations, structural variants, and changes in chromatin state) and architectural factor perturbations (such as mutations in architectural proteins and dysregulation of transcriptional machinery) disrupt genome organization and contribute to disease progression. These findings suggest that alterations in genome structure can, in some contexts, actively reshape oncogenic programs. A major limitation in applying 3D genome insights to cancer biology is the cost and complexity of omics assays. Recent advances in artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) enable inference and prediction of 3D genome organization from sequence and epigenomic features, providing insight into the extent to which genome folding is encoded intrinsically versus dynamically regulated in architectural factors. This perspective provides a unified view of how genome structure is established, how it relates to function, and how its disruption contributes to tumorigenesis.
Overall, chromatin 3D conformation integrates information from multiple molecular features, and thus it may represent a key to decoding cancer phenotypes.
G. Franceschini, Konstantina Georgakopoulou, G. Ciriello et al.· Nature Reviews. Cancer· 0 citations
A comprehensive synthesis of the mechanisms and functional roles of classical chromatin remodelers within both physiological and neoplastic contexts is provided and a hierarchical framework that distinguishes between 'first-level' and 'higher-order' chromatin remodeling is proposed.
The role of nuclear architecture in tumorigenesis, the contribution of lamins to chromatin organization, and the emerging epigenetic control of lamins in cancer progression and metastasis are discussed.
The unique 3D chromatin variation pattern in cancers may become a new biomarker and provide a theoretical basis for epigenetic therapy targeting chromatin spatial organization.
Yang Liu, Minghua Wu· Cell Communication and Signa...· 0 citations
Therapeutically targeting G4s requires balancing their essential regulatory roles with their pathological effects, and understanding this tension is essential for exploiting G4s as therapeutic targets across cancer types.
Anna R. Bartosik, Magda Bujnowska, D. B. Stovall et al.· Critical reviews in biochemi...· 0 citations
The nucleus is a highly organized and dynamic organelle, with hierarchical layers ranging from nucleosome positioning to chromatin domains and higher-order 3D genome topology, and this organization enables precise and context-dependent transcriptional control.
Yi-Nuo Wang, G. Dobreva· Nature Reviews Cardiology· 1 citation
A new machine-learning framework aims to improve the success rate of computational protein design while moving away from results that reproduce sequences found in nature.