Skip to content

Reading the Eyes in VR: Multimodal Modeling of Social Intelligence

Jul 2026 · 0 citations · 57 references
Computer Science

TL;DR

Initial evidence is provided that RMET can be studied as a process-aware assessment task in controlled VR and desktop settings and that VR received higher usability ratings and was also rated as more effortful.

Abstract

Social intelligence, the ability to interpret others'emotions, beliefs, and intentions, is often assessed with the Reading the Mind in the Eyes Test (RMET), in which participants infer mental states from images of the eye region. Yet RMET is typically presented on paper or desktop displays, where viewing geometry can vary across participants, and it rarely includes immediate feedback. We investigated whether presentation medium and brief trial-level feedback influence RMET behavior. We implemented RMET in Unity for both desktop and Virtual Reality (VR), using VR to hold stimulus distance and field of view constant without changing the items. We conducted a 2x2 mixed study with 20 participants, with device (VR vs. desktop) manipulated between subjects and feedback (immediate correctness cue vs. none) manipulated within subjects. Eye-tracking and EEG data were recorded and synchronized with behavioral logs. We analyzed fixation-based gaze measures, EEG signals, response time, accuracy, and subjective measures. Immediate feedback was associated with longer fixation durations and higher EEG-based engagement, while no significant differences were observed in task completion time or total correct answers. Presentation medium did not produce reliable differences in the objective measures, but VR received higher usability ratings and was also rated as more effortful. These results provide initial evidence that RMET can be studied as a process-aware assessment task in controlled VR and desktop settings.

View source

Similar papers

Open access Jul 2026

Seamless interaction in VR: decoding user intent with eye gaze and passive brain–computer interfaces

To the authors' knowledge, this is the first demonstration of real-time EEG decoding of interaction intent during dynamic VR gameplay, contributing toward intuitive user-adapted interfaces driven by physiological signals in immersive environments.

Yanzhao Pan, Lea Rabe, Thorsten O. Zander et al. · 0 citations
#software testing Book Open access Aug 2026

Combining Thinking Aloud and Eye Tracking

It is concluded that combining eye tracking and Thinking Aloud is feasible without compromising data quality and meaningful for comprehensive HCI evaluation.

Tina Frenzel, Inka Schmitz, Lisa Kerwien et al. · 0 citations
Open access Aug 2026

Nausea reshapes visual exploration and pupillary responses to affective images

Perception is a continuous, active, and dynamic process of inference shaped by current goals, past experience, and hard biological constraints. The physiological state of the body is arguably the most fundamental one. Continuous inference about interoceptive states colors perception with emotions, which in turn affect...

Irene Petrizzo, F. Hadj-Bouziane, E. Blini · 0 citations
Aug 2026

Expanding the view of perceptual-cognitive training: The ecological validity of immersive 360° videos evidenced by differences in gaze behavior compared to traditional fixed-screen videos.

While 360° videos have shown promise for enhancing perceptual-cognitive skills in sport, the mechanisms underlying its advantages over traditional video-based training remain unclear. This study tested whether 360° videos promote different visual search strategies compared to traditional fixed screens (FS), and whether...

Maxime Trempe, E. Charbonneau, Virginie Lévesque et al. · 0 citations
Review Open access Jul 2026

Validity of Eye-Tracking Measures in Immersive Virtual Reality: Using Cognitive Theories of Learning

The classification and validity scoring schemes presented in this study contribute to the theory-driven application of eye tracking in IVR, and offer guidance for improving measurement validity in educational psychology.

J. Y. Lee, Jewoong Moon, Fred Paas et al. · 0 citations

Related blog posts

MIT News · Artificial Intelligence Oct 7, 2026

Discovering the value of humanistic inquiry

Students in MIT’s Concourse program delve deeply into the human condition, debate challenging questions, and learn to develop judgment about issues that can’t be quantified.

Microsoft Research Blog Oct 6, 2026

What AI gets wrong and what failure teaches us

Jennifer Neville did not want to go into computer science—but that’s exactly where she landed. Neville discusses the starts and stops that led to her professional sweet spot and her work identifying “surprising failures” making it hard for AI to handle complexity.  The post What AI gets wrong and what failure teaches us appeared first on Microsoft Research.

MIT News · Artificial Intelligence Sep 30, 2026

This game-playing AI is the new champ at Stratego

Able to defeat top-ranked human players and more efficient than other models, the new system could help decision-makers in military maneuvers or business negotiations.

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.