Skip to content

Measuring AI literacy in design education: development and validation of the artificial intelligence literacy scale for design students

Oct 2026 · International Journal of Technology and Design Education · 0 citations · 59 references
Digital literacy in education

Abstract

Generative Artificial Intelligence (AI) is increasingly embedded in design practice, challenging how design education fosters students’ AI literacy and thus prepares students to engage efficiently with AI. However, there is currently no domain-specific theoretical framework and reliable instrument in the literature to conceptualize and assess design students’ AI literacy, hindering its systematic cultivation. This study fills in this gap by developing and validating the Artificial Intelligence Literacy Scale for Design Students (AILS-DS), in accordance with established standards for scale development. The opinions of a wide range of experts were gathered through a qualitative method in order to define the AI literacy for design students, and served as a theoretical framework for the scale’s item pool. Exploratory Factor Analysis (EFA, N  = 294) and Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA, N  = 325) were then applied to explore the underlying factor structure of the scale and validate its psychometric properties. The final 23-item, five-factor scale demonstrated good reliability and construct validity. Five factors (AI Concepts and Technical Skills, AI Tool Proficiency, AI Ethics and Originality Awareness, Recognition of AI Value in Design, and Independent Evaluation of AI Outputs) in the AILS-DS capture both widely acknowledged AI literacy components and design-specific structure, reflecting the designerly way of knowing and thinking. This study provides a practical tool for educators and researchers, supporting the assessment and cultivation of AI literacy in design education and laying a foundation for pedagogical innovation in the AI era.

Read PDF

Similar papers

#artificial intelligence Open access May 2023

Evaluating the Performance of Large Language Models on GAOKAO Benchmark

GAOKAO-Bench is introduced, an intuitive benchmark that employs questions from the Chinese GAOKAO examination as test samples, including both subjective and objective questions that contribute a robust evaluation benchmark for future large language models and offers valuable insights into the advantages and limitations...

Xiaotian Zhang, Chun-yan Li, Yi Zong et al. · 216 citations · ⚡17

KTO: Model Alignment as Prospect Theoretic Optimization

This work proposes a HALO that directly maximizes the utility of generations instead of maximizing the log-likelihood of preferences, and suggests that the best loss depends on the inductive biases most appropriate for a given setting, an oft-overlooked consideration.

Kawin Ethayarajh, Winnie Xu, Niklas Muennighoff et al. · 195 citations · ⚡28
#artificial intelligence Open access Jul 2024

Gender, Race, and Intersectional Bias in Resume Screening via Language Model Retrieval

This work investigates the possibilities of using LLMs in a resume screening setting via a document retrieval framework that simulates job candidate selection and finds that the MTEs are biased, significantly favoring White-associated names in 85% of cases and female-associated names in only 11.1% of cases.

Kyra Wilson, Aylin Caliskan · 131 citations · ⚡8
#artificial intelligence Review Nov 2024

How to Build a Quantum Supercomputer: Scaling from Hundreds to Millions of Qubits

This work shows that orders of magnitude enhancement in performance could be obtained by a combination of hardware improvements and tight quantum-HPC integration and introduces high-performance architectures for quantum-probabilistic computing with custom-designed accelerators to tackle today's industry-scale classical...

Masoud Mohseni, Artur Scherer, K. Johnson et al. · 121 citations · ⚡9
#artificial intelligence Review Oct 2025

Ultralytics YOLO Evolution: An Overview of YOLO26, YOLO11, YOLOv8 and YOLOv5 Object Detectors for Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition

This paper presents a comprehensive overview of the Ultralytics YOLO family, emphasizing architectural evolution, benchmarking, deployment, and emerging directions from YOLOv5 through YOLO27, and examines detection, segmentation, depth, classification, pose, oriented detection, tracking, export, quantization, and deplo...

Ranjan Sapkota, Manoj Karkee · 112 citations · ⚡10

Related blog posts

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.