Skip to content

Autonomous Agents in Software Development: A Vision Paper

Nov 2023 · XP Workshops · Vol abs/2311.18440, pp. 15-23 · 34 citations · ⚡ 2 influential · 33 references
Computer Science

TL;DR

The vision is to leverage the capabilities of multiple GPT agents to contribute to SE tasks and to propose an initial road map for future work, arguing that multiple G PT agents can perform creative and demanding tasks far beyond coding and debugging.

Abstract

Large Language Models (LLM) and Generative Pre-trained Transformers (GPT), are reshaping the field of Software Engineering (SE). They enable innovative methods for executing many software engineering tasks, including automated code generation, debugging, maintenance, etc. However, only a limited number of existing works have thoroughly explored the potential of GPT agents in SE. This vision paper inquires about the role of GPT-based agents in SE. Our vision is to leverage the capabilities of multiple GPT agents to contribute to SE tasks and to propose an initial road map for future work. We argue that multiple GPT agents can perform creative and demanding tasks far beyond coding and debugging. GPT agents can also do project planning, requirements engineering, and software design. These can be done through high-level descriptions given by the human developer. We have shown in our initial experimental analysis for simple software (e.g., Snake Game, Tic-Tac-Toe, Notepad) that multiple GPT agents can produce high-quality code and document it carefully. We argue that it shows a promise of unforeseen efficiency and will dramatically reduce lead-times. To this end, we intend to expand our efforts to understand how we can scale these autonomous capabilities further.

Read PDF

Similar papers

Towards Autonomous Software Development

A three-level taxonomy inspired by autonomous driving that distinguishes degrees of autonomy along a roadmap from today’s AI-assisted development workflows to fully autonomous software development in which AI systems autonomously identify demands and design, implement, verify, and maintain software without human oversi...

Hao Wang, Ruijie Meng, Zhe Ye et al. · 0 citations
Review Aug 2026

Developing LLM-based Multi-Agent Systems in Software Engineering: A Mixed-Method Experience Report

A comprehensive overview of the existing tools and frameworks for implementing MAS in software engineering and a set of lessons learned and challenges that can help researchers and practitioners to select a suitable MAS framework according to their needs are provided.

Maria Sâmyla Serafim de Oliveira, M. Ibiyo, Marco Gianrusso et al. · 1 citation
Preprint Aug 2026

Understanding the Architecture of Coding Agents: An Exploratory Study Using a Research Prototype

This paper presents Ark (Agent Research Kit), a minimal open-source coding agent designed for research and education that preserves the essential architectural mechanisms of modern coding agents while emphasizing simplicity and clarity, and introduces ArkBench, a lightweight benchmark comprising ten representative soft...

Marco Túlio Valente · 0 citations
#artificial intelligence Preprint Sep 2026

Harness-of-Harness: Multi-Day Autonomous Software Development with Continual Improvement

In a multi-day deployment with more than 70 iterations, HoH autonomously develops a first-person-shooter game, featuring a coherent storyline, fully implemented core mechanics, human-playable experience, polished visuals and integrated audio.

Hao Yan, Min-Le Su, Hang-Fan Zhang et al. · 4 citations
Preprint Aug 2026

An Exploratory Study of Agent Plans for Agentic AI Coding Tools in Open-Source Software

Overall, repository-preserved Agent Plans under these tool-specific directories appear to be a narrow but informative artifact for studying task intent and execution guidance in human-agent workflows.

M. Abubakar, Seyedmoein Mohsenimofidi, Jai Lal Lulla et al. · 1 citation
Jul 2026

ICAE-Bench: Evaluating Coding Agents as Interactive Project Builders

ICAE-Bench, a benchmark for evaluating coding agents under interactive project-building settings, starts from a fuzzy product requirement, simulating the dynamic paradigm with an automated User Agent, and introduces three key designs.

Zhongyuan Peng, Dan Huang, Chuyu Zhang et al. · 3 citations · ⚡1

Related blog posts

MIT News · Artificial Intelligence Oct 15, 2026

AI model decodes the language cells use to communicate

A new computational approach reveals how cells communicate to assemble into tissues. This could accelerate stem cell engineering, improve disease models, and inform therapies.

Microsoft Research Blog Oct 15, 2026

Proof-based general-purpose computing with Magnetar

Zero-knowledge proofs can verify computing results without rerunning workloads or exposing sensitive data. Magnetar helps bring them into the mainstream with support for standard programming languages, major speed gains, and quantum-resistant security. The post Proof-based general-purpose computing with Magnetar appeared first on Microsoft Research.

Microsoft Research Blog Oct 6, 2026

What AI gets wrong and what failure teaches us

Jennifer Neville did not want to go into computer science—but that’s exactly where she landed. Neville discusses the starts and stops that led to her professional sweet spot and her work identifying “surprising failures” making it hard for AI to handle complexity.  The post What AI gets wrong and what failure teaches us appeared first on Microsoft Research.

MIT News · Artificial Intelligence Jun 3, 2026

MIT researchers teach AI models to interpret charts

The new ChartNet training dataset could improve the accuracy of vision-language models that help analyze business trends or interpret scientific figures.

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.