Skip to content

Computational and AI-Driven Ecosystem for Structure-Based Covalent Drug Discovery.

Feb 2026 · Accounts of Chemical Research · 4 citations · 56 references
Medicine

Abstract

ConspectusThe field of covalent drug discovery has witnessed a remarkable resurgence in recent years, a trend underscored by the approval of more than 125 covalent drugs by the US FDA as of 2025, which demonstrates their immense therapeutic potential. Driven by ever-increasing computational power and vast amounts of data, deep learning (DL) is profoundly transforming numerous fields, from natural language processing to drug discovery. In the development of covalent drugs, in particular, advanced computational methods centered on data-driven approaches and artificial intelligence (AI) exhibit immense potential. The realization of this potential depends on the construction of a synergistic ecosystem. Here, we define this "ecosystem" as an integrated set of components─including (i) curated covalent-relevant databases, (ii) AI/physics-based predictive and scoring models, (iii) interoperable computational workflows spanning site identification, docking/virtual screening, and lead optimization, and (iv) closed-loop feedback that systematically incorporates experimental outcomes to update data resources and refine/validate models. This begins with the systematic collection of past experimental results to build high-quality databases. These databases, in turn, provide the foundation for developing AI-driven computational tools capable of precisely interfacing with and accelerating downstream tasks, such as molecular docking (for generating physically plausible conformations and conducting large-scale virtual screening) and lead optimization. The application of these AI tools not only guides experimental design, but the resulting key data also feed back into and enrich the databases. Furthermore, in the cutting-edge field of covalent drugs, the precise identification of "druggable" covalent sites on target proteins has emerged as another critically important downstream task.In this Account, we describe a computational and AI-driven ecosystem for structure-based covalent drug discovery and highlight our contributions to this field. By explicitly linking databases, models, workflows, and experimental feedback into a single framework, this Account moves beyond a simple inventory of individual tools to instead offer a systematic and panoramic perspective on an integrated ecosystem for covalent drug discovery, driven by data and computational engines including AI. We focus on how this ecosystem systematically addresses the challenges from covalent binding site identification to lead discovery, thereby fundamentally accelerating the development of next-generation covalent therapies. We first articulate the philosophy behind the construction and updating of covalent databases, emphasizing the necessity of high-quality data. Subsequently, we delve into a suite of cutting-edge, AI-driven computational methods, exploring the potential of deep learning in tasks such as molecular docking, covalent binding site prediction, and lead optimization. To bridge the gap between computational theory and experimental validation, we will use the discovery of potent covalent CRM1 inhibitors as a specific case study, detailing how our customized, structure-based virtual screening pipeline was utilized to achieve a seamless workflow from computational prediction to biological validation. This section is intended to offer actionable guidance for experimental researchers seeking to leverage these powerful computational tools. Finally, we highlight the limitations and potential pitfalls of this AI engine─concerns that are equally relevant when developing AI-driven covalent docking algorithms. Building on our group's recent benchmarking of AI docking methods, we objectively evaluate current performance and discuss how transformative advances such as AlphaFold3 may reshape the field.

View source

Similar papers

#computer vision Review Sep 2017

Agile Software Development Methods: Review and Analysis

Agile - denoting "the quality of being agile, readiness for motion, nimbleness, activity, dexterity in motion" - software development methods are attempting to offer an answer to the eager business community asking for lighter weight along with faster and nimbler software development processes. This is especially the case with the rapidly growing and volatile Internet software industry as well as for the emerging mobile application environment. The new agile methods have evoked substantial amount of literature and debates. However, academic research on the subject is still scarce, as most of existing publications are written by practitioners or consultants. The aim of this publication is to begin filling this gap by systematically reviewing the existing literature on agile software development methodologies. This publication has three purposes. First, it proposes a definition and a classification of agile software development approaches. Second, it analyses ten software development methods that can be characterized as being "agile" against the defined criterion. Third, it compares these methods and highlights their similarities and differences. Based on this analysis, future research needs are identified and discussed.

P. Abrahamsson, O. Salo, Jussi Ronkainen et al. · 728 citations · ⚡54
#machine learning Review Open access Oct 2014

Software development in startup companies: A systematic mapping study

Context: Software startups are newly created companies with no operating history and fast in producing cutting-edge technologies. These companies develop software under highly uncertain conditions, tackling fast-growing markets under severe lack of resources. Therefore, software startups present a unique combination of characteristics which pose several challenges to software development activities. Objective: This study aims to structure and analyze the literature on software development in startup companies, determining thereby the potential for technology transfer and identifying software development work practices reported by practitioners and researchers. Method: We conducted a systematic mapping study, developing a classification schema, ranking the selected primary studies according their rigor and relevance, and analyzing reported software development work practices in startups. Results: A total of 43 primary studies were identified and mapped, synthesizing the available evidence on software development in startups. Only 16 studies are entirely dedicated to software development in startups, of which 10 result in a weak contribution (advice and implications (6); lesson learned (3); tool (1)). Nineteen studies focus on managerial and organizational factors. Moreover, only 9 studies exhibit high scientific rigor and relevance. From the reviewed primary studies, 213 software engineering work practices were extracted, categorized and analyzed. Conclusion: This mapping study provides the first systematic exploration of the state-of-art on software startup research. The existing body of knowledge is limited to a few high quality studies. Furthermore, the results indicate that software engineering work practices are chosen opportunistically, adapted and configured to provide value under the constrains imposed by the startup context.

Nicolò Paternoster, Carmine Giardino, M. Unterkalmsteiner et al. · 394 citations · ⚡54

Related blog posts

MIT News · Artificial Intelligence Aug 27, 2026

Looking beyond natural sequences

A new machine-learning framework aims to improve the success rate of computational protein design while moving away from results that reproduce sequences found in nature.